Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36964508›Full record

SynthesisBMC geriatrics2023

What are the effects of animals on the health and wellbeing of residents in care homes? A systematic review of the qualitative and quantitative evidence.

Noreen Orr, Rebecca Abbott, Alison Bethel, Sarah Paviour, Rebecca Whear, Ruth Garside, Joanna Thompson Coon

Full text readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Loneliness in the End-of-Life: Now What?Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Dogs' Behavioural Responses to Dog-Assisted Interventions: A Field Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Noreen OrrNIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC), College of Medicine & Health, Evidence Synthesis Team, University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St. Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, Devon, UK. N.Orr@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5822-0247
Rebecca AbbottNIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC), College of Medicine & Health, Evidence Synthesis Team, University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St. Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, Devon, UK.
Alison BethelNIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC), College of Medicine & Health, Evidence Synthesis Team, University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St. Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, Devon, UK.
Sarah PaviourCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Rebecca WhearNIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC), College of Medicine & Health, Evidence Synthesis Team, University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St. Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, Devon, UK.
Ruth GarsideEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Knowledge Spa, Truro, Cornwall, TR1 3HD, UK.
Joanna Thompson CoonNIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC), College of Medicine & Health, Evidence Synthesis Team, University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St. Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, Devon, UK.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is some evidence to suggest that animal-assisted interventions can have beneficial impact for residents in long-term care, but the focus of the evidence has largely been on behavioural and psychosocial measured outcomes. Animals, either as companion animals or in the form of pet/animal-assisted therapy, may provide benefits in the form of social contact, as well as opportunities for sensory experiences and meaningful engagement not picked up by outcome tools. This review aimed to create a state-of-knowledge synthesis, bringing together qualitative and quantitative findings, on the impact of animal-human interaction on care home residents and care home staff.

methodsFourteen databases were searched from inception to July 2020. Forward and backward citation chasing of included articles was conducted. Screening was undertaken independently by a team of reviewers. Thematic synthesis and meta-analysis were used to synthesise the qualitative and quantitative data.

resultsThirty-four studies, published in 40 articles (20 qualitative and 20 quantitative) were included. Five themes relating to resident wellbeing were identified in the qualitative evidence synthesis. These were animals as 'living beings', reminiscence and storytelling, caring (as 'doing' and 'feeling'), respite (from loneliness, institutionalisation, and illness), and sensory engagement. A sixth theme related to staff perceptions and wellbeing, and a seventh to animal health and wellbeing. Maintaining identity was identified as an overarching theme. The majority of randomised trials had small sample sizes and were rated as low quality, mostly showing no evidence of beneficial effect. There was, however, limited evidence of a positive effect of pet/animal interaction on outcomes of loneliness, anxiety and depression, supporting the themes of respite and sensory engagement.

conclusionsThe presence of animals can significantly impact the health and wellbeing of some care home residents. Residents had meaningful relationships with animals and derived pleasure and comfort from them. Interacting with animals offered residents a way to maintain a sense of self in the care homes, and with support, residents with dementia could also express their identities. Facilitating residents to interact with animals as part of person-centred care may also help residents to feel 'at home' in the care home.

trial registrationPROSPERO registration no: CRD42017058201.

Indexed as

Animal Assisted TherapyAnimalsHumansLong-Term CareAnimalsAnimal therapyCompanion animalsDementiaLong-term carePetsSystematic reviewWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID36964508
PMCPMC10038779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read85
measurements read14
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.