Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36964479›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2023

The Pulfrich solidity illusion: a surprising demonstration of the visual system's tolerance of solidity violations.

Dawei Bai, Brent Strickland

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dawei BaiDépartement d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Institut Jean Nicod (ENS, EHESS, CNRS), PSL Research University, Paris, France. dawei.bai@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9596-1589
Brent StricklandDépartement d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Institut Jean Nicod (ENS, EHESS, CNRS), PSL Research University, Paris, France. brent.strickland@ens.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical objects behave following the principle of solidity: One solid object cannot pass through another. To what extent does the visual system integrate this physical regularity as a prior constraint? A new variant of the Pulfrich effect demonstrates a surprising degree of tolerance for violations of solidity when pitted against motion and depth cues. When adult participants view a pendulum swinging in the fronto-parallel plane with both eyes (one of which was covered by a light-attenuating filter), they falsely perceive the pendulum as swinging in an elliptical path (known as the "Pulfrich effect"). Here, we show that even when the pendulum's motion takes place entirely behind a solid horizontal bar, observers nevertheless see the pendulum pass through the bar while moving in an ellipse. This illusion suggests that the Pulfrich effect and the underlying stereoscopic depth cues can be robust to object solidity.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionOptical IllusionsAdultDepth PerceptionHumansDepth perceptionHigh-level perceptionPulfrich effectSolidityVisual illusion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.