Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36964426›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2023

Provider Implicit Bias in Prescribing HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) to People Who Inject Drugs.

Alex Dubov, Douglas S Krakower, Nicholas Rockwood, Susanne Montgomery, Steven Shoptaw

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. HIV and Substance Use Disorders.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alex DubovSchool of Behavioral Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA. adubov@llu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2940-0254
Douglas S KrakowerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Population Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Nicholas RockwoodSchool of Behavioral Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Susanne MontgomerySchool of Behavioral Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Steven ShoptawDepartment of Family Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Loma Linda University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

UCLA Rapid, Relevant, Rigorous Implementation Science HubP30MH058107 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Nina Thawata Harawa · 1997 to 2026
$53.5M
NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH058107NIMH NIH HHS P30MH058107-23S3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple HIV outbreaks among people who inject drugs (PWIDs) have occurred in the USA since 2015, highlighting the need for additional HIV prevention tools. Despite high levels of need, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is drastically underutilized among PWIDs. Implicit bias toward PWID held by clinicians may impede PrEP scale-up among these underserved patients. This study examined how primary care providers' (PCPs) clinical decisions related to PrEP can be impacted by biases when the patient has a history of substance use.

methodsWe conducted an online survey of PCPs (n = 208). The survey included the implicit association test (IAT) to assess unconscious attitudes toward PWIDs, direct questions regarding clinicians' explicit PWID attitudes, and an embedded experiment in which we systematically varied the risk behavior of a hypothetical patient and asked PCPs to make clinical judgments.

resultsA minority (32%) of PCPs reported explicit PWID bias. The IAT indicated strong implicit PWID bias (meant IAT score = 0.59, p < .0001) among 88% of the sample. Only 9% of PCPs had no implicit or explicit PWID bias. PWID patients were judged as less likely to adhere to a PrEP regimen, less responsible, and less HIV safety conscious than heterosexual or gay male patients. Anticipated lack of adherence mediated PCPs' intent to prescribe PrEP to PWID.

conclusionsPCPs' bias may contribute to PrEP being under-prescribed to PWID. Implicit and explicit PWID biases were common in our sample. This study illustrates the need to develop and test tailored interventions to decrease biases against PWID in primary care settings.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsDrug UsersHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSubstance Abuse, IntravenousBias, ImplicitHumansMaleAnti-HIV Agentsclinical decision-makingimplicit biaspeople who inject drugspre-exposure prophylaxisprimary care

Identifiers

PMID36964426
PMCPMC10593689
OpenAlexW4360826363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.