Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36964409›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Balloon dilatation is superior to CO

Eleftherios Ntouniadakis, Josefin Sundh, Anders Magnuson, Mathias von Beckerath

Open access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Anesthesia for Bronchoscopy-An Update.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  4. Mapping quality of life after balloon dilatation in subglottic stenosis using Dyspnea index and Short Form Health Survey-36.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  5. How can we identify subglottic stenosis in patients with suspected obstructive disease?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eleftherios NtouniadakisDepartment of Ear Nose and Throat, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 70182, Örebro, Sweden. eleftherios.ntouniadakis@oru.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6065-9016
Josefin SundhDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 70182, Örebro, Sweden.
Anders MagnusonClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 70182, Örebro, Sweden.
Mathias von BeckerathDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Örebro University · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEndoscopic treatment of subglottic stenosis (SGS) is regarded as a safe procedure with rare complications and less morbidity than open surgery yet related with a high risk of recurrence. The abundance of techniques and adjuvant therapies complicates a comparison of the different surgical approaches. The primary aim of this study was to investigate disease recurrence after CO MATERIALS AND

methodsIn a tertiary referral center, two cohorts of previously undiagnosed patients treated for SGS were retrospectively reviewed and followed for 3 years. The CO

resultsNineteen patients were included in the CLC, and 31 in the BDC. The 1-year cumulative recurrence risk was 63.2% for the CLC compared with 12.9% for the BDC (HR 33.0, 95% CI 6.57-166, p < 0.001), and the 3-year recurrence risk was 73.7% for the CLC compared with 51.6% for the BDC (HR 8.02, 95% CI 2.39-26.9, p < 0.001). Recurrence was independently associated with overweight (HR 3.45, 95% CI 1.16-10.19, p = 0.025), obesity (HR 7.11, 95% CI 2.19-23.04, p = 0.001), and younger age at diagnosis (HR 8.18, 95% CI 1.43-46.82, p = 0.018).

conclusionCO

Indexed as

LaryngostenosisLasers, GasCarbon DioxideConstriction, PathologicDilatationHumansObesityOverweightRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCarbon DioxideBalloon dilatationCO2 laserEndoscopic treatmentSubglottic stenosis

Identifiers

PMID36964409
PMCPMC10038384
OpenAlexW4360827109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read38
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.