Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36964403›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2023

An operant social self-administration and choice model in mice.

Leslie A Ramsey, Fernanda M Holloman, Samantha S Lee, Marco Venniro

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A rat model of volitional mutual social interactions.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Social odor choice buffers drug craving.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Role of social context in addiction etiology and recovery.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leslie A RamseyBehavioral Neuroscience Branch Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Leslie.ramsey@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-8129-612X
Fernanda M HollomanBehavioral Neuroscience Branch Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7731-6471
Samantha S LeeBehavioral Neuroscience Branch Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0399-1351
Marco VenniroDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. marco.venniro@som.umaryland.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7653-957X
National Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

The protective effect of volitional social interaction on drug addictionR00DA047976 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI VENNIRO, MARCO · 2021 to 2023
$747k
NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA047976U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) DA047976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about how social factors contribute to neurobiology or neuropsychiatric disorders. The use of mice allows one to probe the neurobiological bases of social interaction, offering the genetic diversity and versatility to identify cell types and neural circuits of social behavior. However, mice typically show lower social motivation compared with rats, leading to the question of whether mice should be used to model complex social behaviors displayed by humans. Studies on mouse social behavior often rely on measures such as time spent in contact with a social partner or preference for a social-paired context, but fail to assess volitional (subject-controlled) rewarding social interaction. Here, we describe a volitional social self-administration and choice model that is an extension of our previous work on rats. Using mice, we systematically compared female adolescent and adult C57BL/6 mice and outbred CD1 mice, showing that operant social self-administration, social seeking during periods of isolation and choice of social interaction over palatable food is significantly stronger in female CD1 mice than in female C57BL/6J mice, independently of age. We describe the requirements for building the social self-administration and choice apparatus and we provide guidance for studying the role of operant social reward in mice. We also discuss its use to study brain mechanisms of operant social reward, potentially extending its application to mouse models of neuropsychiatric disorders. The training commonly requires ~4 weeks for stable social self-administration and 3-4 additional weeks for tests, including social seeking and choice.

Indexed as

Conditioning, OperantSocial BehaviorAdolescentAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleFoodHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRats

Identifiers

PMID36964403
PMCPMC12637245
OpenAlexW4360840153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.