Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36964323›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2023

Diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup.

Carlo Ticconi, Elena Nicastri, Silvia D'Ippolito, Carlo Chiaramonte, Adalgisa Pietropolli, Giovanni Scambia, Nicoletta Di Simone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carlo TicconiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Section of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy. ticconi@med.uniroma2.it.ORCID 0000-0003-1923-2744
Elena NicastriDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Section of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Silvia D'IppolitoU.O.C. di Ostetricia e Patologia Ostetrica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6160-0558
Carlo ChiaramonteDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Adalgisa PietropolliDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Section of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0598-5446
Giovanni ScambiaIstituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9503-9041
Nicoletta Di SimoneDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20072, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1273-3335

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is limited information on the risk factors for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL).

methodsIn this study, a patient-based approach was used to investigate the possible involvement and relative relevance of a large number of diagnostic factors in 843 women with RPL who underwent an extensive diagnostic workup including 44 diagnostic factors divided into 7 major categories.

resultsThe rates of abnormalities found were: (1) genital infections: 11.74%; (2) uterine anatomic defects: 23.72%; (3) endocrine disorders: 29.42%; (4) thrombophilias: 62%; (5) autoimmune abnormalities: 39.2%; (6) parental karyotype abnormalities 2.25%; (7) clinical factors: 87.78%. Six hundred and fifty-nine out of eight hundred and forty-three women (78.17%) had more than one abnormality. The mean number of pregnancy losses increased by increasing the number of the abnormalities found (r = 0.86949, P < 0.02). The factors associated with the highest mean number of pregnancy losses were cervical isthmic incompetence, anti-beta-2-glycoprotein-1 antibodies, unicornuate uterus, anti-prothrombin A antibodies, protein C deficiency, and lupus anticoagulant. The majority of the considered abnormalities had similar, non-significant prevalence between women with 2 versus ≥ 3 pregnancy losses with the exception of age ≥ 35 years and MTHFR A1298C heterozygote mutation. No difference was found between women with primary and secondary RPL stratified according to the number of abnormalities detected (Chi-square: 8.55, P = 0.07). In these women, the only factors found to be present with statistically different rates were age ≥ 35 years, cigarette smoking, and genital infection by Ureaplasma.

conclusionA patient-based diagnostic approach in women with RPL could be clinically useful and could represent a basis for future research.

Indexed as

Abortion, HabitualAbortion, InducedAntiphospholipid SyndromeAdultAutoantibodiesFemaleHumansKaryotypingPregnancyAutoantibodiesDiagnostic factorsPregnancy complicationsRecurrent pregnancy lossRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID36964323
PMCPMC10191960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.