Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36964300›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical research2023

Perspectives on the Wetting of Solids in Pharmaceutical Systems.

Ann Newman, George Zografi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ann NewmanSeventh Street Development Group, PO Box 251, Kure Beach, NC, 24889, 765-650-4462, USA. ann.newman@seventhstreetdev.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2051-2295
George ZografiSchool of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe ability of water and aqueous solutions to wet relatively nonpolar pharmaceutical solids during the processing and administration of solid dosage forms is an important part of development.

resultsVarious factors, both fundamental and technological, which are important to wettability are reviewed and analyzed. Initially, the ideal thermodynamic importance of liquid surface tension and solid surface energetics, determined by the contact angle and the polarity of the solid surface, are established. Then, emphasis is placed on various factors that change the surface energetics due to crystal defects, polymorphism, varying Miller Indices, crystal habit, amorphous structure, variable surface concentration of components in a formulation mixture, surface roughness, and complex pore structure. Case studies cover single component systems (APIs and excipients), binary mixtures (amorphous solid dispersions and physical mixtures), multicomponent systems (granules and tablets), as well as disintegration and dissolution of solid oral dosage forms.

conclusionsThis perspective and analysis indicates the primary importance of understanding and modifying solid surface energetics, surface chemical and physical heterogeneities, and pore structure to promote wettability in pharmaceutical systems.

Indexed as

ExcipientsWaterPharmaceutical PreparationsWettabilityExcipientsPharmaceutical PreparationsWatercontact angleliquid pore penetrationsolid surface energywashburn equationwettability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.