ReviewPharmaceutical research2023
Perspectives on the Wetting of Solids in Pharmaceutical Systems.
Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigating Surfactant Selection in In Vitro Dissolution Testing: Mechanistic Insights and Practical Strategies.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- Comparative Formulation and Physicochemical Evaluation of Orodispersible Films Fabricated via Pneumatic and Syringe-Based 3D Printing.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Article
- Highly Soluble Ternary Amorphous Glibenclamide-Arginine-Folic Acid Formulation Using Arginine as a Coformer, and Wettability Agent.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2025Article
- Optimizing the encapsulation of the refined extract of squash peels for functional food applications: A sustainable approach to reduce food waste.Open life sciences · 2025Article
- Studying the API Distribution of Controlled Release Formulations Produced via Continuous Twin-Screw Wet Granulation: Influence of Matrix Former, Filler and Process Parameters.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe ability of water and aqueous solutions to wet relatively nonpolar pharmaceutical solids during the processing and administration of solid dosage forms is an important part of development.
resultsVarious factors, both fundamental and technological, which are important to wettability are reviewed and analyzed. Initially, the ideal thermodynamic importance of liquid surface tension and solid surface energetics, determined by the contact angle and the polarity of the solid surface, are established. Then, emphasis is placed on various factors that change the surface energetics due to crystal defects, polymorphism, varying Miller Indices, crystal habit, amorphous structure, variable surface concentration of components in a formulation mixture, surface roughness, and complex pore structure. Case studies cover single component systems (APIs and excipients), binary mixtures (amorphous solid dispersions and physical mixtures), multicomponent systems (granules and tablets), as well as disintegration and dissolution of solid oral dosage forms.
conclusionsThis perspective and analysis indicates the primary importance of understanding and modifying solid surface energetics, surface chemical and physical heterogeneities, and pore structure to promote wettability in pharmaceutical systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36964300What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.