Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36964281›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2023

Halal or Haram? The COVID-19 Vaccine Discussion Among Twitter users in Malaysia.

Nur Ayuni Mohd Jenol, Nur Hafeeza Ahmad Pazil

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nur Ayuni Mohd JenolSchool of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Minden, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.
Nur Hafeeza Ahmad PazilSchool of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Minden, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia. hafeezapazil@usm.my.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4856-8204
Universiti Sains Malaysia · MY

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education (MY) FRGS/1/2020/SS0/USM/02/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy is gaining attention due to the increasing spread of the COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia. Malaysia is a majority Muslim country and religion has a significant influence on the acceptance or rejection of vaccines. This is clearly seen through the disagreement over the  halal status of vaccines. Social media has become a platform for discussion and dissemination of information and dis-information on vaccines. Thus, it has had a relatively significant influence on vaccine hesitancy among social media users. By analysing tweets from February 2020 to February 2021 using Twitter API, this paper highlights the discussion of COVID-19 vaccines' halal status on Twitter. This study focuses on the analysis of vaccination reluctancy among the Twitter users in Malaysia and found that the most prevalent theme from the discussion is the constructed religious narratives to justify scientifically misleading and false claims concerning vaccination represented on social media. This finding also calls for a deeper understanding of society's constructed knowledge concerning contemporary issues in the digital age on social media.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansMalaysiaPandemicsCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19HalalSocial mediaTwitter discussionVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36964281
PMCPMC10038381
OpenAlexW4360797204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.