Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36964236›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2023

Gender-specific counselling of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma and Lynch syndrome.

Clara Cerrato, Savio Domenico Pandolfo, Riccardo Autorino, Andrea Panunzio, Alessandro Tafuri, Antonio Benito Porcaro, Alessandro Veccia, Vincenzo De Marco, Maria Angela Cerruto, Alessandro Antonelli and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Gender aspects in urological disease.World journal of urology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Clara CerratoDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Savio Domenico PandolfoUrology Unit, "Federico II University", Naples, Italy.
Riccardo AutorinoDepartment of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Andrea PanunzioDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Alessandro TafuriDepartment of Urology, Vito Fazzi" Hospital, Lecce, Italy.
Antonio Benito PorcaroDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Alessandro VecciaDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Vincenzo De MarcoDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Maria Angela CerrutoDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Alessandro AntonelliDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Ithaar H DerweeshDepartment of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, USA.
Maria Carmen Mir MaresmaDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario La Ribera, Valencia, Spain. mirmare@yahoo.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1391-1378
University of Verona · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITHospital de La Ribera · ESOspedale Vito Fazzi · ITRush University Medical Center · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant genetic syndrome resulting in a wide spectrum of malignancies caused by germline mutations in mismatch repair genes (MMR). Gene mutations have different effects and penetrance between the two genders. The aim of this review is to offer a gender-specific evidence-based clinical guide on diagnosis, screening, surveillance, and counselling of UTUC patients with LS.

methodsUsing MEDLINE, a non-systematic review was performed including articles between 2004 and 2022. English language original articles, reviews, and editorials were selected based on their clinical relevance.

resultsUpper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is the third most common malignancy in Lynch syndrome. Up to 21% of new UTUC cases may have unrecognized LS as the underlying cause. LS-UTUC does not have a clear gender prevalence, even if it seems to slightly prefer the male gender. The MSH6 variant is significantly associated with female gender (p < 0.001) and with gynecological malignancies. Female MSH2 and MLH1 carriers have higher rates for endometrial and ovarian cancer with respect to the general population, while male MSH2 and MLH1 carriers have, respectively, higher rate of prostate cancer and upper GI tract, or biliary or pancreatic cancers. Conflicting evidence remains on the association of testicular cancer with LS.

conclusionLS is a polyhedric disease, having a great impact on patients and their families that requires a multidisciplinary approach. UTUC patients should be systematically screened for LS, and urologists have to be aware that the same MMR mutation may lead to different malignancies according to the patient's gender.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsCounselingHumansMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinSex FactorsMLH1 protein, humanMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinFemale genderHereditary cancerLynch syndromeMale genderUpper tract urothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID36964236
OpenAlexW4360828743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.