Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36964206›Full record

ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2023

Dilemmas in parenteral glucose delivery and approach to glucose monitoring and interpretation in the neonate.

Cynthia L Blanco, Victor Smith, Sara E Ramel, Camilia R Martin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cynthia L BlancoDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. blanco@uthscsa.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7496-8709
Victor SmithDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Sara E RamelDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8485-418X
Camilia R MartinDepartment of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2783-6126

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glucose control continues to be challenging for intensivists, in particular in high-risk neonates. Many factors play a role in glucose regulation including intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Optimal targets for euglycemia are debatable with uncertain short and long-term effects. Glucose measurement technology has continued to advance over the past decade; unfortunately, the availability of these advanced devices outside of research continues to be problematic. Treatment approaches should be individualized depending on etiology, symptoms, and neonatal conditions. Glucose infusions should be titrated based upon variations in organ glucose uptake, co-morbidities and postnatal development. In this article we summarize the most common dilemmas encountered in the NICU: ranges for euglycemia, physiological differences, approach for glucose measurements, monitoring and best strategies to control parenteral glucose delivery.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseGlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringHumansInfant, NewbornParenteral NutritionBlood GlucoseGlucose

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.