Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36963766›Full record

ReviewOpen heart2023

Pathophysiology, emerging techniques for the assessment and novel treatment of aortic stenosis.

Syed Muneeb Shah, Jay Shah, Samuel Mark Lakey, Pankaj Garg, David Paul Ripley

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open heart, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Lipid-lowering therapies for aortic stenosis: a drug-target Mendelian randomization study.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Syed Muneeb ShahSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.
Jay ShahSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.
Samuel Mark LakeyDepartment of Cardiology, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1724-6539
Pankaj GargDepartment of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
David Paul RipleySchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK david.ripley@northumbria-healthcare.nhs.uk.
Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Sunderland · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our perspectives on aortic stenosis (AS) are changing. Evolving from the traditional thought of a passive degenerative disease, developing a greater understanding of the condition's mechanistic underpinning has shifted the paradigm to an active disease process. This advancement from the 'wear and tear' model is a result of the growing economic and health burden of AS, particularly within industrialised countries, prompting further research. The pathophysiology of calcific AS (CAS) is complex, yet can be characterised similarly to that of atherosclerosis. Progressive remodelling involves lipid-protein complexes, with lipoprotein(a) being of particular interest for diagnostics and potential future treatment options.There is an unmet clinical need for asymptomatic patient management; no pharmacotherapies are proven to slow progression and intervention timing varies. Novel approaches are developing to address this through: (1) screening with circulating biomarkers; (2) development of drugs to slow disease progression and (3) early valve intervention guided by medical imaging. Existing biomarkers (troponin and brain natriuretic peptide) are non-specific, but cost-effective predictors of ventricular dysfunction. In addition, their integration with cardiovascular MRI can provide accurate risk stratification, aiding aortic valve replacement decision making. Currently, invasive intervention is the only treatment for AS. In comparison, the development of lipoprotein(a) lowering therapies could provide an alternative; slowing progression of CAS, preventing left ventricular dysfunction and reducing reliance on surgical intervention.The landscape of AS management is rapidly evolving. This review outlines current understanding of the pathophysiology of AS, its management and future perspectives for the condition's assessment and treatment.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationAortic ValveBiomarkersHumansLipoprotein(a)BiomarkersLipoprotein(a)AORTIC VALVE DISEASEAortic Valve StenosisBiomarkersDiagnostic Imaging

Identifiers

PMID36963766
PMCPMC10040005
OpenAlexW4360844243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.