ReviewOpen heart2023
Pathophysiology, emerging techniques for the assessment and novel treatment of aortic stenosis.
Review in Open heart, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute bi-ventricular haemodynamic changes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis assessed using invasive pressure-volume loops.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Whole-transcriptome analysis of Aortic Stenosis reveals dysregulated RNA networks, immune cell infiltration, and NADK2 as a candidate regulator.Hereditas · 2026Article
- Aortic Valve Interventions in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: Who, Why, and When?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Gamma-Oryzanol Attenuates Aortic Valve Interstitial Cell Calcification via Suppression of BMP2-SMAD and MAPK Signaling Pathways.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Matrix metalloproteinase activation and TNF upregulation characterize the sclerotic phase of aortic valve disease.British journal of biomedical science · 2026Article
- Shared Risk Factors and Molecular Mechanisms Between Aortic Stenosis and Atherosclerosis: A Rationale for Therapeutic Repositioning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Comparison of TAVR with SAVR on clinical outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Performance in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Strain Analysis for Aortic Stenosis: Validation with Echocardiography and Healthy Controls.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Aortic Stenosis: Toward a Comprehensive Cardiometabolic Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Lipid-lowering therapies for aortic stenosis: a drug-target Mendelian randomization study.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2025Article
- Polymeric Heart Valves: Do They Represent a Reliable Alternative to Current Prosthetic Devices?Polymers · 2025Review
- Clonal Hematopoiesis Is Associated With Adverse Clinical Outcomes and Left Ventricular Remodeling in Aortic Stenosis.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Insights into calcific aortic valve stenosis: a comprehensive overview of the disease and advancing treatment strategies.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Deep-learning survival analysis for patients with calcific aortic valve disease undergoing valve replacement.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Complex aortic plaques: hidden danger in aortic stenosis. Role of transesophageal echocardiography.Archivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascularReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our perspectives on aortic stenosis (AS) are changing. Evolving from the traditional thought of a passive degenerative disease, developing a greater understanding of the condition's mechanistic underpinning has shifted the paradigm to an active disease process. This advancement from the 'wear and tear' model is a result of the growing economic and health burden of AS, particularly within industrialised countries, prompting further research. The pathophysiology of calcific AS (CAS) is complex, yet can be characterised similarly to that of atherosclerosis. Progressive remodelling involves lipid-protein complexes, with lipoprotein(a) being of particular interest for diagnostics and potential future treatment options.There is an unmet clinical need for asymptomatic patient management; no pharmacotherapies are proven to slow progression and intervention timing varies. Novel approaches are developing to address this through: (1) screening with circulating biomarkers; (2) development of drugs to slow disease progression and (3) early valve intervention guided by medical imaging. Existing biomarkers (troponin and brain natriuretic peptide) are non-specific, but cost-effective predictors of ventricular dysfunction. In addition, their integration with cardiovascular MRI can provide accurate risk stratification, aiding aortic valve replacement decision making. Currently, invasive intervention is the only treatment for AS. In comparison, the development of lipoprotein(a) lowering therapies could provide an alternative; slowing progression of CAS, preventing left ventricular dysfunction and reducing reliance on surgical intervention.The landscape of AS management is rapidly evolving. This review outlines current understanding of the pathophysiology of AS, its management and future perspectives for the condition's assessment and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.