Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36963163›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2023

New insights into GPCR coupling and dimerisation from cryo-EM structures.

Anastasiia Gusach, Javier García-Nafría, Christopher G Tate

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Conformational equilibria in the activation of cystine-knot hormone receptors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Stabilized DNature communications · 2025
    Article
  11. Dimerization propensity of the βProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Structural insights into CXCR4 modulation and oligomerization.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anastasiia GusachMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge CB2 2QH, UK. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/GusachAnastasia.
Javier García-NafríaInstitute for Biocomputation and Physics of Complex Systems (BIFI) and Laboratorio de Microscopías Avanzadas (LMA), University of Zaragoza, 50018, Zaragoza, Spain. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/JGarciaNafria.
Christopher G TateMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge CB2 2QH, UK. Electronic address: cgt@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105197215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past three years (2020-2022) more structures of GPCRs have been determined than in the previous twenty years (2000-2019), primarily of GPCR complexes that are large enough for structure determination by single-particle cryo-EM. This review will present some structural highlights that have advanced our molecular understanding of promiscuous G protein coupling, how a G protein receptor kinase and β-arrestins couple to GPCRs, and GPCR dimerisation. We will also discuss advances in the use of gene fusions, nanobodies, and F

Indexed as

GTP-Binding ProteinsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledCryoelectron MicroscopyGTP-Binding ProteinsReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID36963163
PMCPMC10423944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.