Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36963078›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Feasibility and usability of a very low-cost bubble continuous positive airway pressure device including oxygen blenders in a Ugandan level two newborn unit.

Anna B Hedstrom, James Nyonyintono, Eugene A Saxon, Heidi Nakamura, Hilda Namakula, Beatrice Niyonshaba, Josephine Nakakande, Noelle Simpson, Madeline Vaughan, Alec Wollen and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05462509 (Feasibility of Use of the PATH bCPAP Kit Including Oxygen Blenders in a Neonatal Population in Uganda), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05462509 nacompletednot on this map

Feasibility of Use of the PATH bCPAP Kit Including Oxygen Blenders in a Neonatal Population in Uganda

TypeinterventionalSponsorPATHRan2021 to 2021Enrolled14ConditionsRespiratory Distress Syndrome, Infant, PrematureArmsbCPAP with blenders
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Anna B HedstromDepartment of Pediatrics and Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3269-1892
James NyonyintonoKiwoko Hospital, Kiwoko, Uganda.
Eugene A SaxonEPFL EssentialTech Centre, the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0779-5374
Heidi NakamuraAdara Development, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8723-9844
Hilda NamakulaAdara Development, Sydney, Australia.
Beatrice NiyonshabaAdara Development, Sydney, Australia.
Josephine NakakandeKiwoko Hospital, Kiwoko, Uganda.
Noelle SimpsonAdara Development, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4834-9669
Madeline VaughanAdara Development, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9611-0989
Alec WollenMedical Devices and Health Technologies, PATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4812-3523
Paul MubiriDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2259-3455
Peter WaiswaDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-0515
Patricia S CoffeyMedical Devices and Health Technologies, PATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8961-0910
Maneesh BatraDepartment of Pediatrics and Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
South Australian Research and Development Institute · AUKiwoko Hospital · UGMakerere University · UGUniversity of Washington · USÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreterm birth and resulting respiratory failure is a leading cause of newborn death- the majority of which occur in resource-constrained settings and could be prevented with bubble continuous positive airway pressure (bCPAP). Commercialized devices are expensive, however, and sites commonly use improvised devices utilizing 100% oxygen which can cause blindness. To address this, PATH and a multidisciplinary team developed a very low-cost bCPAP device including fixed-ratio oxygen blenders.

objectiveWe assessed feasibility of use of the device on neonatal patients as well as the usability and acceptability of the device by healthcare workers. This study did not evaluate device effectiveness.

methodsThe study took place in a Ugandan level two unit. Neonates with respiratory failure were treated with the bCPAP device. Prospective data were collected through observation as well as likert-style scales and interviews with healthcare workers. Data were analyzed using frequencies, means and standard deviation and interviews via a descriptive coding method. Retrospectively registered via ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT05462509.

resultsFourteen neonates were treated with the bCPAP device in October-December 2021. Patients were born onsite (57%), with median weight of 1.3 kg (IQR 1-1.8). Median treatment length was 2.5 days (IQR 2-6). bCPAP was stopped due to: improvement (83%) and death (17%). All patients experienced episodes of saturations >95%. Median time for device set up: 15 minutes (IQR 12-18) and changing the blender: 15 seconds (IQR 12-27). After initial device use, 9 out of 9 nurses report the set-up as well as blender use was "easy" and their overall satisfaction with the device was 8.5/10 (IQR 6.5-9.5). Interview themes included the appreciation for the ability to administer less than 100% oxygen, desire to continue use of the device, and a desire for additional blenders.

conclusionsIn facilities otherwise using 100% oxygen, use of the bCPAP device including oxygen blenders is feasible and acceptable to healthcare workers.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT05462509.

Identifiers

PMID36963078
PMCPMC10021653
OpenAlexW4323540085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read49
identifiers read7
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.