ArticlePLOS global public health2023
From global recommendations to (in)action: A scoping review of the coverage of companion of choice for women during labour and birth.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Association between personal birth companion and maternal mental health in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of continuous labor companion- who is the best: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Impact of the Strengthening Teamwork and Respect (STAR) intervention on organisational learning culture and person-centred maternity care in rural South Africa: an uncontrolled before-and-after implementation study.The Lancet regional health. Africa · 2026Article
- How Supportive Care Shapes Women's Childbirth Satisfaction: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Labor support in low- and middle-income countries - transformative impact of birth companions and doulas on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a narrative review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Review
- Article
- Obstetric Care Providers' Practices and Associated Factors Towards Birth Companionship in Public Hospitals of South Gondar zone, Northwest Ethiopia, 2025.SAGE open medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- A scoping review of person-centred maternity care service in humanitarian and fragile settings.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- The lived experiences of postnatal mothers receiving birth companionship care in Katavi region, Tanzania: A phenomenological study.SAGE open medicine · 2025Article
- Women's preferences, impacts, and satisfaction with companion support during labour and delivery experiences in Oman.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
- Labour companionship and respectful treatment of women during childbirth: a cross-sectional study across 16 hospitals in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- Measuring the positive potential value of birth in economic evaluation of perinatal interventions.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
- The role of birth companionship in women's experiences of mistreatment during childbirth and postpartum anxiety and depression: An analysis of a cross-sectional survey.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Towards a universal implementation of labor companionship: a synthesis of the policy and facility environment of eight low-and-middle income countries.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- Refugee women's and providers' perceptions of person-centered maternity care: a qualitative study in two refugee camps in Chad.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Perinatal care in SARS-CoV-2 infected women: the lesson learnt from a national prospective cohort study during the pandemic in Italy.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Inconsistent definitions of labour progress and over-medicalisation cause unnecessary harm during birth.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023Article
- Comparing observed occurrence of mistreatment during childbirth with women's self-report: a validation study in Ghana, Guinea and Nigeria.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- Women's and health providers' perceptions of companionship during labor and childbirth: a formative study for the implementation of WHO companionship model in Burkina Faso.Reproductive health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Women greatly value and benefit from the presence of someone they trust to support them throughout labour and childbirth ('labour companion of choice'). Labour companionship improves maternal and perinatal outcomes, including enhancing physiological labour and birth experiences. Despite clear benefits, implementation is slow. We conducted a scoping review to assess coverage and models of labour companionship, including quantitative studies reporting coverage of labour companionship in any level health facility globally. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Global Health from 1 January 2010-14 December 2021. We extracted data on study design, labour companionship coverage, timing and type of companions allowed, and recoded data into categories for comparison across studies. We included data from a maternal health sentinel network of hospitals in Latin America, using descriptive statistics to assess coverage among 120,581 women giving birth in these sites from April 2018-April 2022. In the scoping review, we included 77 studies from 27 countries. There was wide variation in the coverage of labour companionship: almost one-third of studies reported coverage less than 40%, and one-third of studies reported coverage between 40-80%. Husbands or partners were the most frequent companion (37.7%, 29/77), followed by family member or friend (gender not specified) (32.5%, 25/77), family member or friend (female-only) (13.0%, 10/77). Across nine sentinel hospitals in five Latin American countries, there was variation in coverage, with no companion at any time ranging from 14.9%-93.8%. Despite the well-known benefits and factors affecting implementation of labour companionship, more work is needed to improve equitable coverage. Concerted efforts are needed to engage with communities, health workers, health managers, and policy-makers to establish policies, address implementation barriers, and integrate data on coverage into perinatal records and quality processes to ensure that all women have access. Harmonized reporting of labour companionship would greatly enhance understanding at global level.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.