Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36963032›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Inferences from COVID-19 post-exposure risk assessment of health care workers in the pre-vaccination era at a major COVID sentinel center, Sri Lanka.

Dammalage L Bhagya Piyasiri, Wijayawardhene Ganaka G Senaratne, Pathirawasam Krishantha Jayasekera, Vigeetha H Withanage, Nayomi S Danthanarayana, Harshanie A Ubeysekara, Kankanamge D Dulnie S Wijeweera

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dammalage L Bhagya PiyasiriMicrobiology, Teaching Hospital Karapitiya, Galle, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4660-311X
Wijayawardhene Ganaka G SenaratneMedicine, Teaching Hospital Karapitiya, Galle, Sri Lanka.
Pathirawasam Krishantha JayasekeraMedicine, Teaching Hospital Karapitiya, Galle, Sri Lanka.
Vigeetha H WithanageVirology, Teaching Hospital Karapitiya, Galle, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6720-0950
Nayomi S DanthanarayanaVirology, Teaching Hospital Karapitiya, Galle, Sri Lanka.
Harshanie A UbeysekaraAdministration, Teaching Hospital Karapitiya,Galle, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1917-6845
Kankanamge D Dulnie S WijeweeraMicrobiology, Teaching Hospital Karapitiya, Galle, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0023-8161
Teaching Hospital Kandy · LK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the hospital triage system trying to prevent COVID-19 patients from getting admitted to wards other than isolation/quarantine units, COVID-19 patients were accidentally being discovered time to time from non-COVID-19 wards due to atypical or asymptomatic presentations. Consequently, post-exposure risk assessment was carried out for the relevant health care workers (HCW) and the other patients to assess their risk level of acquiring COVID-19, and to quarantine them if concluded as high risk. Hence, the objective of the study was to assess the outcome and the adequacy of COVID-19 post-exposure risk assessment of health care workers which would be useful in future outbreaks. We studied all events of accidental detection of COVID-19 patients happened in non-COVID-19 wards which were leading to subsequent risk assessment using the 5-questions based tool adapted from the WHO recommendations. The 5 questions discussed the protective measures during face to face meetings or in physical contacts, protective measures during aerosol generating procedures, splashes onto the face, and hand hygiene measures. A retrospective cross-sectional study carried out in the Teaching Hospital Karapitiya, Galle, Sri Lanka, for 4 months covering the second wave of the pandemic. Hospital data base of risk assessments was accessed anonymously and the "yes" or "no" responses to the 5-questions assessment tool were analysed. There were 62 events involving 891 health care workers who underwent post-exposure risk assessment. From the responses the highest score of "yes" was recorded against question 3 (25.7% of total "yes" answers for all questions and 5.8% of total answers for the question number 3) revealing inadequate precautions taken by HCWs in aerosol generating procedures. Hundred and sixty two (18.2%) HCWs were quarantined as high risk and only one became positive for COVID-19 during the quarantine period. Though the 5-question based risk assessment tool effectively helps to identify breaches in infection control during an exposure to a positive COVID-19 patient, it may not be adequate at times as the only tool in deciding the assessee's risk level.

Identifiers

PMID36963032
PMCPMC10021685
OpenAlexW4320908498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read10
identifiers read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.