ArticlePLOS global public health2023
Stress and coping strategies among higher secondary and undergraduate students during COVID-19 pandemic in Nepal.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- The dual-burden of professional and academic stress: a cross-sectional mapping of mental health status and coping efficacy among postgraduate students in Nairobi, Kenya.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Psychometric Properties of the Brief COPE Inventory on a Student Sample.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Mental health status and coping strategies during COVID-19 pandemic among university students in Central Serbia.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic has profoundly affected lives around the globe and has caused a psychological impact among students by increasing stress and anxiety. This study evaluated the stress level, sources of stress of students of Nepal and their coping strategies during the pandemic. A cross-sectional web-based study was conducted during the complete lockdown in July 2020 among 615 college students. Stress owing to COVID-19 and the lockdown was assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (Brief COPE) was used to evaluate coping strategies. To compare the stress level among participants chi-square test was used. The Student's t-test was used to compare Brief COPE scores among participants with different characteristics. The majority of study participants were female (53%). The mean PSS score was (±SD) of 20.2±5.5, with 77.2% experiencing moderate and 10.7% experiencing a high-stress level. Moderate to high levels of stress were more common among girls (92.6%) than boys (82.7%) (P = 0.001). However, there was a significant difference in perceived stress levels disaggregated by the students' age, fields and levels of study, living status (with or away from family), parent's occupation, and family income. The mean score for coping strategy was the highest for self-distraction (3.3±0.9), whereas it was the lowest for substance use (1.2±0.5). Students with a low level of stress had a higher preference for positive reframing and acceptance, whereas those with moderate to high levels of stress preferred venting. Overall, students experienced high stress during the lockdown imposed as part of governmental efforts to control COVID-19. Therefore, the findings of our study suggest stress management programs and life skills training. Also, further studies are necessary to conduct a longitudinal assessment to analyse the long-term impact of this situation on students' psychological states.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.