Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962988›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

The World Health Organization's Disease Outbreak News: A retrospective database.

Colin J Carlson, Matthew R Boyce, Margaret Dunne, Ellie Graeden, Jessica Lin, Yasser Omar Abdellatif, Max A Palys, Munir Pavez, Alexandra L Phelan, Rebecca Katz

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Exploring the Mosquito-Arbovirus Network: A Survey of Vector Competence Experiments.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Variations in annual dengue intensities are explained by temperature anomalies.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Colin J CarlsonCenter for Global Health Science and Security, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6960-8434
Matthew R BoyceCenter for Global Health Science and Security, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6224-9755
Margaret DunneLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0664-8954
Ellie GraedenCenter for Global Health Science and Security, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Jessica LinCenter for Global Health Science and Security, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9508-4865
Yasser Omar AbdellatifCenter for Global Health Science and Security, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Max A PalysCenter for Global Health Science and Security, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Munir PavezCenter for Global Health Science and Security, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2692-5007
Alexandra L PhelanCenter for Global Health Science and Security, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Rebecca KatzCenter for Global Health Science and Security, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7596-431X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) notifies the global community about disease outbreaks through the Disease Outbreak News (DON). These online reports tell important stories about both outbreaks themselves and the high-level decision making that governs information sharing during public health emergencies. However, they have been used only minimally in global health scholarship to date. Here, we collate all 2,789 of these reports from their first use through the start of the Covid-19 pandemic (January 1996 to December 2019), and develop an annotated database of the subjective and often inconsistent information they contain. We find that these reports are dominated by a mix of persistent worldwide threats (particularly influenza and cholera) and persistent epidemics (like Ebola virus disease in Africa or MERS-CoV in the Middle East), but also document important periods in history like the anthrax bioterrorist attacks at the turn of the century, the spread of chikungunya and Zika virus to the Americas, or even recent lapses in progress towards polio elimination. We present three simple vignettes that show how researchers can use these data to answer both qualitative and quantitative questions about global outbreak dynamics and public health response. However, we also find that the retrospective value of these reports is visibly limited by inconsistent reporting (e.g., of disease names, case totals, mortality, and actions taken to curtail spread). We conclude that sharing a transparent rubric for which outbreaks are considered reportable, and adopting more standardized formats for sharing epidemiological metadata, might help make the DON more useful to researchers and policymakers.

Identifiers

PMID36962988
PMCPMC10021193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read1
identifiers read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.