Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962976›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Acceptability, feasibility, and accuracy of blood-based HIV self-testing: A cross-sectional study in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Bao Vu Ngoc, Mohammed Majam, Kimberly Green, Ton Tran, Minh Tran Hung, Anh Luong Que, Diep Bui Ngoc, Chuong Hoang Le Duy

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bao Vu NgocPATH, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5529-5411
Mohammed MajamEzintsha, Wits Health Consortium, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0302-5353
Kimberly GreenPATH, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Ton TranPasteur Institute, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4473-878X
Minh Tran HungCenter for Creative Initiatives in Health and Population, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Anh Luong QuePasteur Institute, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Diep Bui NgocCenter for Creative Initiatives in Health and Population, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Chuong Hoang Le DuyPasteur Institute, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Institut Pasteur in Ho Chi Minh City · VNCenter for Creative Initiatives in Health and Population · VNUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HIV self-testing (HIVST) is an effective approach to increase testing uptake. While oral fluid-based HIVST has been rapidly scaled, use of blood-based HIVST remains limited. We evaluated the acceptability, feasibility, and accuracy of blood-based HIVST among lay users in Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), Vietnam. We conducted a cross-sectional study among HIV testing clients at the HCMC Pasteur Institute from March 2019 to October 2020. Participants received one HIVST kit and performed the test in front of an observer. The observer used product-specific questionnaires to collect information on the HIVST process, test results, experiences. The participants' interpretations of HIVST results were compared to health staff's interpretations and gold standard laboratory EIA reference tests. Of 2,399 participants who accepted HIVST, 64.7% were men, 62.1% aged 25-49 years, 53.5% had a higher education level, 41.4% were employed, and 35.6% were first-time testers. The vast majority (94.4%) desired to use the test in the future, and 93.9% reported willingness to recommend the test. The majority (90.8%) of participants successfully completed the self-test. One factor associated with successful completion was higher education level (aOR = 1.85; 95% CI: 1.32-2.61); while participants self-testing with SURE CHECK (aOR = 0.21; 95% CI: 0.12-0.37), INSTI (aOR = 0.23; 95% CI: 0.13-0.39), and BioSURE (aOR = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.17-0.51) or being unemployed, retired, or doing housework (aOR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.25-0.82) were less likely to perform the test successfully. Agreement of positive and negative HIVST results as interpreted by participants and health staff was high (98.1% and 99.9%, respectively). Sensitivity and specificity of the evaluated HIVST were 96.43% (95% CI: 93.62-99.23) and 99.9% (95% CI: 99.75-100), respectively. Our findings confirm that blood-based HIVST is highly acceptable, feasible, and accurate. This evidence informs scale-up of HIVST to increase uptake of essential HIV prevention and treatment services.

Identifiers

PMID36962976
PMCPMC10022389
OpenAlexW4318765528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read204
identifiers read12
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.