ArticlePLOS global public health2023
Birth registration in Nepal: An assessment of progress based on two national surveys.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Missed at birth: a cross-sectional analysis of national determinants and subnational changes in birth registration coverage in Kenya, using 2014 and 2022 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Improving the timeliness of birth registration in Fiji through a financial incentive.Global epidemiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Birth registration, an essential component of the civil registration system, is expected to be complete and universal. This study assesses the progress made in recent years and identifies gaps in birth registration in Nepal. Data from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys undertaken in 2014 and 2019 are used for the analysis. The two surveys included a total of 12,007 children under five years of age living with their mothers at the time of the surveys. The survey respondents were 11,821 mothers and 186 caretakers (in the case of those without mothers) of the children. The variations in the proportion of births registered among various subgroups of the children are assessed by performing bivariate analysis and binary logistic regression. Birth registration increased considerably, from 58% (95% CI: 57-59%) in 2014 to 77% (95% CI: 76-78%) in 2019. Several of the disparities between and among the various population subgroups that were evident in the 2014 survey had been considerably reduced or eliminated by 2019. The disparities in registration between boys and girls attenuated over time. Although birth registration increased for all children (ages 0-59 months old), infants still had comparatively lower levels of registration. The relatively disadvantaged provinces showed significant progress between the two survey periods. Considerable and significant progress has been made in birth registration in recent years. However, achieving universal and complete birth registration would require sustaining recent achievements and applying proven strategic interventions to ensure the inclusion of the unregistered births.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.