Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962960›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Economic evaluation of a cluster randomized, non-inferiority trial of differentiated service delivery models of HIV treatment in Zimbabwe.

Mariet Benade, Brooke E Nichols, Geoffrey Fatti, Salome Kuchukhidze, Kudakwashe Takarinda, Nicoletta Mabhena-Ngorima, Ashraf Grimwood, Sydney Rosen

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Mariet BenadeDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9498-3199
Brooke E NicholsDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4682-4999
Geoffrey FattiKheth'Impilo AIDS Free Living, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6467-662X
Salome KuchukhidzeDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1230-5074
Kudakwashe TakarindaAIDS & TB Department, Ministry of Health & Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2980-7735
Nicoletta Mabhena-NgorimaKheth'Impilo AIDS Free Living, Cape Town, South Africa.
Ashraf GrimwoodKheth'Impilo AIDS Free Living, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sydney RosenDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6560-2964
Boston University · USKheth’Impilo · ZAMinistry of Health and Child Welfare · ZWWestern Cape Department of Health · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

About 85% of Zimbabwe's >1.4 million people living with HIV are on antiretroviral treatment (ART). Further expansion of its treatment program will require more efficient use of existing resources. Two promising strategies for reducing resource utilization per patient are multi-month medication dispensing and community-based service delivery. We evaluated the costs to providers and patients of community-based, multi-month ART delivery models in Zimbabwe. We used resource and outcome data from a cluster-randomized non-inferiority trial of three differentiated service delivery (DSD) models targeted to patients stable on ART: 3-month facility-based care (3MF), community ART refill groups (CAGs) with 3-month dispensing (3MC), and CAGs with 6-month dispensing (6MC). Using local unit costs, we estimated the annual cost in 2020 USD of providing HIV treatment per patient from the provider and patient perspectives. In the trial, retention at 12 months was 93.0% in the 3MF, 94.8% in the 3MC, and 95.5% in the 6MC arms. The total average annual cost of HIV treatment per patient was $187 (standard deviation $39), $178 ($30), and $167 ($39) in each of the three arms, respectively. The annual cost/patient was dominated by ART medications (79% in 3MF, 87% in 3MC; 92% in 6MC), followed by facility visits (12%, 5%, 5%, respectively) and viral load (8%, 8%, 2%, respectively). When costs were stratified by district, DSD models cost slightly less, with 6MC the least expensive in all districts. Savings were driven by differences in the number of facility visits made/year, as expected, and low uptake of annual viral load tests in the 6-month arm. The total annual cost to patients to obtain HIV care was $10.03 ($2) in the 3MF arm, $5.12 ($0.41) in the 3MC arm, and $4.40 ($0.39) in the 6MF arm. For stable ART patients in Zimbabwe, 3- and 6-month community-based multi-month dispensing models cost less for both providers and patients than 3-month facility-based care and had non-inferior outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID36962960
PMCPMC10021451
OpenAlexW4324032617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read57
identifiers read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.