Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962955›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Estimates of the cost to build a stand-alone environmental surveillance system for typhoid in low- and middle-income countries.

Brittany Hagedorn, Nicolette A Zhou, Christine S Fagnant-Sperati, Jeffry H Shirai, Jillian Gauld, Yuke Wang, David S Boyle, John Scott Meschke

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brittany HagedornInstitute for Disease Modeling, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1489-7168
Nicolette A ZhouEnvironmental and Occupational Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Christine S Fagnant-SperatiEnvironmental and Occupational Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9794-307X
Jeffry H ShiraiEnvironmental and Occupational Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9864-532X
Jillian GauldInstitute for Disease Modeling, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Yuke WangCenter of Global Safe Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene in the Hubert Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
David S BoyleDiagnostics Program, PATH, Seattle, WA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4019-9037
John Scott MeschkeEnvironmental and Occupational Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The typhoid conjugate vaccine is a safe and effective method for preventing Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (typhoid) and the WHO's guidance supports its use in locations with ongoing transmission. However, many countries lack a robust clinical surveillance system, making it challenging to determine where to use the vaccine. Environmental surveillance is one alternative approach to identify ongoing transmission, but the cost to implement such a strategy is previously unknown. This paper estimated the cost of setting up and operating an environmental surveillance program for thirteen protocols that are in development, including thirteen cost components and twenty-seven pieces of equipment. Unit costs were obtained from research labs involved in protocol development and equipment information was obtained from manufacturers and the expert opinion of individuals in participating labs. We used Monte Carlo simulations to estimate the costs and the input parameters were modeled as distributions to incorporate the uncertainty. Total costs per sample including setup, overhead, and operational costs, range from $357-794 at a scale of 25 sites to $116-532 at 125 sites. Operational costs (ongoing expenditures) range from $218-584 per sample at a scale of 25 sites to $74-421 at 125 sites. Eleven of the thirteen protocols have operational costs below $200, at this higher scale. Protocols with higher up-front equipment costs benefit more from scale efficiencies and sensitivity analyses show that laboratory labor, processes, and consumables are the primary drivers of uncertainty. At scale, environmental surveillance for typhoid may be affordable (depending on the protocol, scale, and geographic context), though cost will need to be considered alongside future evaluations of test sensitivity. Opportunities to leverage existing infrastructure and multi-disease platforms may be necessary to further reduce costs.

Identifiers

PMID36962955
PMCPMC10021573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read7
identifiers read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.