Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962948›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Uptake of community antiretroviral group delivery models for persons living with HIV in Arua district, Uganda: A parallel convergent mixed methods study.

Wani Muzeyi, Semeere Aggrey, Dennis Kalibbala, Thomas Katairo, Fred C Semitala, Achilles Katamba, Irene Ayakaka, Nelson Kalema

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wani MuzeyiClinical Epidemiology Unit, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6337-7636
Semeere AggreyInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Dennis KalibbalaClinical Epidemiology Unit, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Thomas KatairoClinical Epidemiology Unit, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2002-8911
Fred C SemitalaDepartment of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0624-7640
Achilles KatambaClinical Epidemiology Unit, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Irene AyakakaUganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Nelson KalemaInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community antiretroviral groups (CAGs) is one of the innovative and efficient differentiated service delivery models (DSDM) for reaching persons needing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment in the community. Since DSDM adoption in Uganda, evidence suggests better care outcomes for patients in DSDM compared to counterparts in routine health facility care. However, uptake of CAG models for eligible community groups of persons living with HIV (PLHIV) has been slow in Arua district, Uganda and stakeholders' perceptions regarding its implementation unexplored. The objective of the study was to determine the uptake, barriers and facilitators influencing CAG model implementation in Arua district, Uganda. We conducted a parallel convergent mixed-methods study from March 2020 to December 2020 at Adumi health centre IV and Kuluva hospital in Arua district. We enrolled and extracted data for every fifth virally suppressed participant on antiretroviral therapy (ART) at the two health facilities. Data were analysed using STATA 13.0. Uptake was determined as the proportion of eligible PLHIV that were enrolled into a group. We performed logistic regression to determine factors associated with uptake. We conducted one focus group discussion per facility among healthcare workers involved in the management of PLHIV. We also conducted 7 focus group discussions among PLHIV across the two facilities. Thematic analysis was used to describe the data. A total of 399 PLHIV were eligible for CAG, 61.6% were female, and 44.9% were on dolutegravir (DTG) based regimen. Uptake was 6.8%, 95% CI (4.7-9.7) and was found to be significantly associated with being divorced or separated in a marriage (OR; 0.14, 95%CI; 0.02-0.92, P = 0.014). Members picking drugs in turns, comforting and encouraging others to take the drugs, and health workers advising them to join and stay with other group members were perceived as facilitators to uptake of community antiretroviral group delivery model. Having few and distant eligible members in the local area to form a group, lack of transport among the member to pick the drugs when it's their turn, misunderstandings and lack of confidentiality amongst the members, and lack of partner disclosure were perceived as barriers to uptake of community antiretroviral group delivery model. Uptake of community antiretroviral group delivery model in Arua district is very low. There may be a need to support community antiretroviral group delivery models with income- generating activities, transport facilitation, closer community drug pick-up points and improved partner disclosure support mechanisms among married group members.

Identifiers

PMID36962948
PMCPMC10021482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read28
identifiers read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.