Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962942›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Perceptions around COVID-19 and vaccine hesitancy: A qualitative study in Kaski district, Western Nepal.

Preeti Mahato, Bipin Adhikari, Sujan Babu Marahatta, Susagya Bhusal, Kshitij Kunwar, Rajesh Kumar Yadav, Sushila Baral, Anisha Adhikari, Edwin van Teijlingen

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. WHO declares Mpox a public health emergency: "Therapeutic advances in infectious disease
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Preeti MahatoDepartment of Health Studies, School of Life Sciences and the Environment, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1166-8463
Bipin AdhikariMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8981-3910
Sujan Babu MarahattaManmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Susagya BhusalManmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Kshitij KunwarCentral Department of Public Health, Tribhuwan University, Kirtipur, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7123-4136
Rajesh Kumar YadavOne Heart World Wide, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2319-4701
Sushila BaralProvincial Health Training Centre, Gandaki Province, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4516-3503
Anisha AdhikariSchool of Health and Allied Sciences, Pokhara University, Pokhara, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0253-8915
Edwin van TeijlingenCentre for Midwifery, Maternal & Perinatal Health, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5523-8583
Manmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences · NPBournemouth University · GBMahidol University · THPokhara University · NPRoyal Holloway University of London · GBTribhuvan University · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burgeoning morbidity and mortality due to COVID-19 pandemic including the peaks in outbreaks due to different variants have attracted global attention. Although the development and rolling out of vaccines have been impressive, low- and middle-income countries suffer from a double burden: (1) lack of adequate vaccines; and (2) low vaccine uptake (vaccine hesitancy). The main objective of this study was to explore perceptions around COVID-19 and vaccine hesitancy among urban and rural population in Western Nepal. A qualitative study was conducted in six urban wards of Pokhara municipality and four rural municipalities in Kaski district of Nepal. A semi-structured interview guide was used to interview participants who were selected purposively to explore the perceived burden of COVID-19 pandemic, roles, and contributions of vaccine. Nineteen interviews were conducted by telephone following a government recommendation to avoid face-to-face meetings. Audio-recorded interviews were thematically analysed after transcription and translation into English. COVID-19 is a major (public) health concern and affects people at an individual, societal and national level. People dreaded its health hazards and consequences and seemed to be compliant with public health measures such as maintaining social distance, wearing masks and maintaining hygiene. Vaccine was considered to be a major intervention to fight the pandemic, nonetheless, the rationale and benefits of vaccines were blemished by the perceived lack of the vaccine's effectiveness, duration of protection, and its potential side-events. Expedited development of vaccine was embraced with suspicion that vaccine may have incurred compromise in quality. Science and rationale behind vaccine were smeared by misinformation and clearly counteracting the misinformation were deemed critical. Providing information about vaccines through government entities (who are trusted) and respected individuals may engender trust and uptake of vaccine. Fighting off misinformation of COVID-19 is critical to curb the course of pandemic. Increased attention towards monitoring and investing in legitimacy of information and offering information through trusted sources can help improve the vaccine coverage.

Identifiers

PMID36962942
PMCPMC10022296
OpenAlexW4321192573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read3
identifiers read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.