Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962938›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Cataract services for all: Strategies for equitable access from a global modified Delphi process.

Jacqueline Ramke, Juan Carlos Silva, Michael Gichangi, Thulasiraj Ravilla, Helen Burn, John C Buchan, Vivian Welch, Clare E Gilbert, Matthew J Burton, Cataract Access Study Group

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Strategies to address inequity of uncorrected refractive error in the Western Pacific: A modified Delphi process.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jacqueline RamkeInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5764-1306
Juan Carlos SilvaPan American Health Organization, World Health Organization, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4855-5008
Michael GichangiOphthalmic Services Unit, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Thulasiraj RavillaAravind Eye Care System, Madurai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1935-7443
Helen BurnInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1469-8169
John C BuchanInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Vivian WelchBruyère Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Clare E GilbertInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Matthew J BurtonInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Cataract Access Study Group

Funding

Wellcome TrustWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vision loss from cataract is unequally distributed, and there is very little evidence on how to overcome this inequity. This project aimed to engage multiple stakeholder groups to identify and prioritise (1) delivery strategies that improve access to cataract services for under-served groups and (2) population groups to target with these strategies across world regions. We recruited panellists knowledgeable about cataract services from eight world regions to complete a two-round online modified Delphi process. In Round 1, panellists answered open-ended questions about strategies to improve access to screening and surgery for cataract, and which population groups to target with these strategies. In Round 2, panellists ranked the strategies and groups to arrive at the final lists regionally and globally. 183 people completed both rounds (46% women). In total, 22 distinct population groups were identified. At the global level the priority groups for improving access to cataract services were people in rural/remote areas, with low socioeconomic status and low social support. South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa were the only regions in which panellists ranked women in the top 5 priority groups. Panellists identified 16 and 19 discreet strategies to improve access to screening and surgical services, respectively. These mostly addressed health system/supply side factors, including policy, human resources, financing and service delivery. We believe these results can serve eye health decision-makers, researchers and funders as a starting point for coordinated action to improve access to cataract services, particularly among population groups who have historically been left behind.

Identifiers

PMID36962938
PMCPMC10021896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read15
identifiers read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.