Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962889›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

The supply is there. So why can't pregnant and breastfeeding women in rural India get the COVID-19 vaccine?

Nadia G Diamond-Smith, Preetika Sharma, Mona Duggal, Navneet Gill, Jagriti Gupta, Vijay Kumar, Jasmeet Kaur, Pushpendra Singh, Katy Bradford Vosburg, Alison M El Ayadi

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nadia G Diamond-SmithUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8711-3029
Preetika SharmaPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2349-0420
Mona DuggalPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9404-2871
Navneet GillPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0999-266X
Jagriti GuptaSurvival of Women and Children Foundation, Panchkula, India.
Vijay KumarSurvival of Women and Children Foundation, Panchkula, India.
Jasmeet KaurDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4757-2973
Pushpendra SinghDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8435-0881
Katy Bradford VosburgUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8018-9920
Alison M El AyadiUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2674-4887
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INUniversity of California, San Francisco · USFistulacure · INIndraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite COVID-19 vaccines being available to pregnant women in India since summer 2021, little is known about vaccine uptake among this high need population. We conducted mixed methods research with pregnant and recently delivered rural women in northern India, consisting of 300 phone surveys and 15 in-depth interviews, in November 2021. Only about a third of respondents were vaccinated, however, about half of unvaccinated respondents reported that they would get vaccinated now if they could. Fears of harm to the unborn baby or young infant were common (22% of unvaccinated women). However, among unvaccinated women who wanted to get vaccinated, the most common barrier reported was that their health care provider refused to provide them the vaccine. Gender barriers and social norms also played a role, with family members restricting women's access. Trust in the health system was high, however, women were most often getting information about COVID-19 vaccines from sources that they did not trust, and they knew they were getting potentially poor-quality information. Qualitative data shed light on the barriers women faced from their family and health care providers but described how as more people got the vaccine that norms were changing. These findings highlight how pregnant women in India have lower vaccination rates than the general population, and while vaccine hesitancy does play a role, structural barriers from the health care system also limit access to vaccines. Interventions must be developed that target household decision-makers and health providers at the community level, and that take advantage of the trust that rural women already have in their health care providers and the government. It is essential to think beyond vaccine hesitancy and think at the system level when addressing this missed opportunity to vaccinate high risk pregnant women in this setting.

Identifiers

PMID36962889
PMCPMC10022347
OpenAlexW4311652762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read63
identifiers read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.