Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962877›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Community health workers and Covid-19: Cross-country evidence on their roles, experiences, challenges and adaptive strategies.

Solomon Salve, Joanna Raven, Priya Das, Shuchi Srinivasan, Adiba Khaled, Mahwish Hayee, Gloria Olisenekwu, Kate Gooding

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
28.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Solomon SalveOxford Policy Management, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5510-9706
Joanna RavenDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4112-6959
Priya DasOxford Policy Management, Delhi, India.
Shuchi SrinivasanOxford Policy Management, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3161-6636
Adiba KhaledOxford Policy Management, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mahwish HayeeOxford Policy Management, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Gloria OlisenekwuOxford Policy Management, Abuja, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0463-736X
Kate GoodingOxford Policy Management, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Oxford Policy Management · GBLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBSustainable Development Policy Institute · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community health workers (CHWs) are a key part of the health workforce, with particular importance for reaching the most marginalised. CHWs' contributions during pandemics have received growing attention, including for COVID-19. This paper contributes to learning about CHWs' experiences during COVID-19, based on evidence from India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Kenya and Ethiopia. The paper synthesises evidence from a set of research projects undertaken over 2020-2021. A thematic framework based on the research focus and related literature was used to code material from the reports. Following further analysis, interpretations were verified with the original research teams. CHWs made important contributions to the COVID-19 response, including in surveillance, community education, and support for people with COVID-19. There was some support for CHWs' work, including training, personal protective equipment and financial incentives. However, support varied between countries, cadres and individual CHWs, and there were significant gaps, leaving CHWs vulnerable to infection and stress. CHWs also faced a range of other challenges, including health system issues such as disrupted medical supply chains, insufficient staff and high workloads, a particular difficulty for female CHWs who were balancing domestic responsibilities. Their work was also affected by COVID-19 public health measures, such as restrictions on gatherings and travel; and by supply-side constraints related to community access and attitudes, including distrust and stigmatization of CHWs as infectious or informers. CHWs demonstrated commitment in adapting their work, for example ensuring patients had adequate drugs in advance of lockdowns, and using their own money and time to address increased transport costs and higher workloads. Effectiveness of these adaptations varied, and some involved coping in a context of inadequate support. CHW are critical for effective response to disease outbreaks, including pandemics like COVID-19. To support CHWs' contribution and protect their wellbeing, CHWs need adequate resources, managerial support, and motivation.

Identifiers

PMID36962877
PMCPMC10022071
OpenAlexW4313485185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read1
identifiers read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.