Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962873›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Delivery cost of the first public sector introduction of typhoid conjugate vaccine in Navi Mumbai, India.

Dayoung Song, Sarah W Pallas, Rahul Shimpi, N Ramaswamy, Pradeep Haldar, Pauline Harvey, Pankaj Bhatnagar, Arun Katkar, Niniya Jayaprasad, Abhishek Kunwar and 5 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Dayoung SongPolicy and Economic Research Department, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sarah W PallasGlobal Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Rahul ShimpiWorld Health Organization, India Country Office, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5362-9158
N RamaswamyNavi Mumbai Municipal Corporation, Navi Mumbai, India.
Pradeep HaldarMinistry of Family Health and Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7654-9396
Pauline HarveyWorld Health Organization, India Country Office, New Delhi, India.
Pankaj BhatnagarWorld Health Organization, India Country Office, New Delhi, India.
Arun KatkarWorld Health Organization, India Country Office, New Delhi, India.
Niniya JayaprasadWorld Health Organization, India Country Office, New Delhi, India.
Abhishek KunwarWorld Health Organization, India Country Office, New Delhi, India.
Sunil BahlWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi, India.
Win MorganLevin and Morgan LLC, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7834-3359
Raymond HutubessyDepartment of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kashmira DateGlobal Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Vittal MogasalePolicy and Economic Research Department, International Vaccine Institute, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0596-8072

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation (NMMC), a local government in Mumbai, India, implemented the first public sector TCV campaign in 2018. This study estimated the delivery costs of this TCV campaign using a Microsoft Excel-based tool based on a micro-costing approach from the government (NMMC) perspective. The campaign's financial (direct expenditures) and economic costs (financial costs plus the monetized value of additional donated or existing items) incremental to the existing immunization program were collected. The data collection methods involved consultations with NMMC staff, reviews of financial and programmatic records of NMMC and the World Health Organization (WHO), and interviews with the health staff of sampled urban health posts (UHPs). Three UHPs were purposively sampled, representing the three dominant residence types in the catchment area: high-rise, slum, and mixed (high-rise and slum) areas. The high-rise area UHP had lower vaccination coverage (47%) compared with the mixed area (71%) and slum area UHPs (76%). The financial cost of vaccine and vaccination supplies (syringes, safety boxes) was $1.87 per dose, and the economic cost was $2.96 per dose in 2018 US dollars. Excluding the vaccine and vaccination supplies cost, the financial delivery cost across the 3 UHPs ranged from $0.37 to $0.53 per dose, and the economic delivery cost ranged from $1.37 to $3.98 per dose, with the highest delivery costs per dose in the high-rise areas. Across all 11 UHPs included in the campaign, the weighted average financial delivery cost was $0.38 per dose, and the economic delivery cost was $1.49 per dose. WHO has recommended the programmatic use of TCV in typhoid-endemic countries, and Gavi has included TCV in its vaccine portfolio. This first costing study of large-scale TCV introduction within a public sector immunization program provides empirical evidence for policymakers, stakeholders, and future vaccine campaign planning.

Identifiers

PMID36962873
PMCPMC10022355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC0
measurements read34
identifiers read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.