Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962861›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Predictors of admission to an assertive outreach service for psychosis in Lebanon.

Ghida Kassir, Samer El Hayek, Raghid Charara, Michele Cherro, Hala Itani, Joseph El Khoury

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ghida KassirDepartment of Psychiatry, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7887-4926
Samer El HayekDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7975-6104
Raghid ChararaCenter for Behavioral Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5785-8225
Michele CherroDepartment of Psychiatry, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Hala ItaniDepartment of Psychiatry, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5496-7298
Joseph El KhouryDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, American Hospital Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4529-6840

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schizophrenia is a chronic, debilitating mental illness that contributes significantly to the global burden of disease. Assertive outreach treatment for patients with schizophrenia and psychotic disorders has been implemented to improve treatment adherence and outcomes. The suitability of this model of care outside the western context has not been fully established. We describe the characteristics of 45 patients enrolled in the Psychosis Recovery Outreach Program (PROP), a program developed at a leading psychiatric facility in Lebanon. We collected twelve-month data for patients and used logistic regression models to identify predictor variables for enrollment in the service compared to those receiving standard treatment. Patients were mostly males (77.8%), younger than 39 years (80%), of college or higher education (68.2%), and diagnosed with schizophrenia (46.7%) or schizoaffective disorder (48.9%). About one-quarter (22.7%) had a comorbid cannabis use disorder. A majority received more than one oral antipsychotic (75.6%) while half (51.1%) were maintained on a long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic. The following variables were significant predictors of enrollment in PROP: having a comorbid cannabis use disorder (OR 2.83 [1.25 - 6.37]), being prescribed a LAI antipsychotic (OR 9.99 [4.93-20.24]) or more than one oral antipsychotic (OR 4.57 [2.22-9.39]), visiting the emergency department more than once (OR 8.7 [2.64-28.68]), and admission to the psychiatry unit (OR 13.91 [3.17-60.94]). In addition, those following up in PROP were younger and less likely to be in the oldest age group (over 54 years) [OR 0.11 (0.01-0.93)], less likely to be females (OR 0.39 [0.18-0.81]), and less likely to be diagnosed with "other psychotic disorder" as compared to schizophrenia (OR 0.14 [0.03 - 0.62]). Our findings highlight that the assertive outreach model of care is applicable to its target population in the context of psychiatric care in Lebanon, namely young individuals with psychosis, higher comorbidities and a severe course of illness.

Identifiers

PMID36962861
PMCPMC10021548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read24
identifiers read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.