Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962819›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Factors associated with stunting among children 0 to 59 months of age in Angola: A cross-sectional study using the 2015-2016 Demographic and Health Survey.

Paulo Renato Correa

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Analysis ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Children's Characteristics as the Predictors of Stunting among Children Under 2 Years in East Nusa Tenggara in Indonesia.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paulo Renato CorreaProgramme in Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5513-8141
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stunting among children under five years of age is a serious public health problem globally, with life-long consequences to health, well-being, and productivity. Stunted growth has complex and multifactorial causes, reflecting the interaction of a broad range of conditions that determine child health. The Angola 2015-2016 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) collected nationally representative anthropometry for 6,359 children 0 to 59 months of age in Angola, and ascertained exposure to a wide range of child, parental, socio-economic, and geographic variables. This study used a cross-sectional design to identify exposures associated with stunting among children 0 to 59 months of age in Angola, while considering the multifactorial and multi-level causes of stunting. Main outcome was prevalence of stunting, defined as proportion of children with height-for-age Z-score (HAZ) two or more standard deviations below the median. Prevalence of stunting was associated with individual, household, and area-level exposure variables, including child age and sex, birth order, birthweight, diarrhea, maternal and paternal age and education, source of water, sanitary system, and province. In conclusion, prevalence of stunting in Angola is associated with several factors previously described in the literature. Stunting is associated with exposures at the distal, intermediate, and proximal levels, in line with the framework on the causes of childhood malnutrition. This study identifies opportunities for interventions at multiple levels to decrease prevalence of stunting among children in Angola. Main limitations of this study are the potential for survival bias and residual confounding.

Identifiers

PMID36962819
PMCPMC10021435
OpenAlexW4311180848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read68
identifiers read9
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.