Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962818›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Prevalence, determinants and attitude towards herbal medicine use in the first trimester of pregnancy in Cameroon: A survey in 20 hospitals.

Aminkeng Zawuo Leke, Helen Dolk, Maria Loane, Karen Casson, Nkwati Michel Maboh, Susan Etta Maeya, Lerry Dibo, Pauline Bessem Nyenti, Armstrong Obale, Derick Etiendem

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Usage of traditional medicine during pregnancy and the associated factors among Basotho women.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aminkeng Zawuo LekeCentre for Maternal, Fetal and Infant Research, Institute for Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Jordanstown, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7268-6820
Helen DolkCentre for Maternal, Fetal and Infant Research, Institute for Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Jordanstown, United Kingdom.
Maria LoaneCentre for Maternal, Fetal and Infant Research, Institute for Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Jordanstown, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1206-3637
Karen CassonCentre for Maternal, Fetal and Infant Research, Institute for Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Jordanstown, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6178-4748
Nkwati Michel MabohCentre for Maternal and Infant Research, Health Research Foundation (HRF), Buea, Cameroon.
Susan Etta MaeyaCentre for Maternal and Infant Research, Health Research Foundation (HRF), Buea, Cameroon.
Lerry DiboCentre for Maternal and Infant Research, Health Research Foundation (HRF), Buea, Cameroon.
Pauline Bessem NyentiCentre for Maternal and Infant Research, Health Research Foundation (HRF), Buea, Cameroon.
Armstrong ObaleCentre for Maternal and Infant Research, Health Research Foundation (HRF), Buea, Cameroon.
Derick EtiendemCentre for Maternal and Infant Research, Health Research Foundation (HRF), Buea, Cameroon.
Health Research Foundation · CAUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To examine the prevalence, determinants and attitude towards herbal medication (HM) use in the first trimester of pregnancy in Cameroon women. Between March to August 2015, we surveyed 795 pregnant women attending 20 randomly selected urban or rural hospitals in South West Cameroon on first trimester orthodox medication (OM) and HM use. Data was obtained by interviews using structured questionnaires. First trimester HM use was reported by 293 (36∙9%) women, 76% of whom used it in combination with OM. The most frequent indication for taking HM was prevention/treatment of anaemia (26∙3%). The HM were usually self-prescribed (33∙3%) or by family (56∙2%), and obtained from the woman's own garden (69∙3%). Twenty percent of women believed that HM was always safe to take in pregnancy, compared to 69.3% for OM. Intake of HM was significantly influenced by women's opinion on OM or HM safety-the odds of taking HM was 3 time higher among women who were unsure about the safety of OM (AOR: 3∙0, 95%CI = 1∙5-6∙1), while women who thought HM were never safe or who were unsure about its safety, were 91% or 84% respectively less likely to take HM compared to women who believed HM were always safe. We identified a high prevalence of HM use and concomitant use with OM, strongly influenced by women's perception of HM and OM safety. These findings indicate the need for WHO to specifically address safety in pregnancy in its policy to integrate traditional medicine use into existing healthcare systems in Africa.

Identifiers

PMID36962818
PMCPMC10021538
OpenAlexW4293579436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read63
identifiers read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.