Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962814›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Facilitating behavioral change: A comparative assessment of ASHA efficacy in rural Bihar.

Oskar Burger, Faiz Hashmi, Maciej J Dańko, Santosh Akhauri, Indrajit Chaudhuri, Emily Little, Hannah G Lunkenheimer, Sudipta Mondal, Nachiket Mor, Neela Saldanha and 4 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Oskar BurgerCenter for Applied Cognitive Science, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7552-5851
Faiz HashmiCenter for Applied Cognitive Science, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2382-2931
Maciej J DańkoMax Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7924-9022
Santosh AkhauriProject Concern International, Patna, India.
Indrajit ChaudhuriProject Concern International, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8248-4402
Emily LittleNurturely, Bend, Oregon, United States of America.
Hannah G LunkenheimerCenter for Applied Cognitive Science, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0106-8053
Sudipta MondalProject Concern International, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0480-7966
Nachiket MorBanyan Academy of Leadership in Mental Health at Kanchipuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8136-2844
Neela SaldanhaYale Research Initiative on Innovation and Scale, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0128-8283
Janine SchooleyProject Concern International, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Palash SinghSCOPE, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1967-8455
Tracy JohnsonBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Cristine H LegareCenter for Applied Cognitive Science, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7838-4396

Funding

Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Elizabeth T. Gershoff · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community health worker (CHW) programs are essential for expanding health services to many areas of the world and improving uptake of recommended behaviors. One of these programs, called Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHA), was initiated by the government of India in 2005 and now has a workforce of about 1 million. ASHAs primarily focus on improving maternal and child health but also support other health initiatives. Evaluations of ASHA efficacy have found a range of results, from negative, to mixed, to positive. Clarity in forming a general impression of ASHA efficacy is hindered by the use of a wide range of evaluation criteria across studies, a lack of comparison to other sources of behavioral influence, and a focus on a small number of behaviors per study. We analyze survey data for 1,166 mothers from Bihar, India, to assess the influence of ASHAs and eight other health influencers on the uptake of 12 perinatal health behaviors. We find that ASHAs are highly effective at increasing the probability that women self-report having practiced biomedically-recommended behaviors. The ASHA's overall positive effect is larger than any of the nine health influencer categories in our study (covering public, private, and community sources), but their reach needs to be more widely extended to mothers who lack sufficient contact with ASHAs. We conclude that interactions between ASHAs and mothers positively impact the uptake of recommended perinatal health behaviors. ASHA training and program evaluation need to distinguish between individual-level and program-level factors in seeking ways to remove barriers that affect the reach of ASHA services.

Identifiers

PMID36962814
PMCPMC10021476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read40
reference markers read2
identifiers read10
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.