Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962780›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Facebook and mosquito-borne disease outbreaks: An analysis of public responses to federal health agencies' posts about dengue and Zika in 2016.

Pablo Carvajal, Jo Anne G Balanay, Sachiyo Shearman, Stephanie L Richards

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pablo CarvajalDepartment of Health Education and Promotion, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jo Anne G BalanayDepartment of Health Education and Promotion, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3173-3293
Sachiyo ShearmanSchool of Communication, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0506-9942
Stephanie L RichardsDepartment of Health Education and Promotion, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0072-9251
East Carolina University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Responses of Facebook users to four United States federal health agencies' social media posts about dengue and Zika (mosquito-borne diseases), surveillance, and control during the Zika outbreak in 2016 were tracked. Official Facebook pages of health agencies were analyzed, and a qualitative analysis program was used to perform a thematic analysis of the data on public responses to health agency posts. Public sentiment analysis showed that Facebook users had a negative sentiment towards health information observed in this study. Themes were identified in the studied posts, giving insight into the nature of public discussions and responses to federal health agencies. Themes were assessed based on the way the agencies' mosquito-borne disease information was received by the public through the social media platform, Facebook. Results indicate that public perception/understanding of mosquito-borne disease outbreaks can be assessed by analyzing public interactions with health agencies on Facebook. The importance of maximizing effectiveness by addressing issues in sharing health education information, risk communication, and monitoring of public responses by health agencies through social media platforms is discussed.

Identifiers

PMID36962780
PMCPMC10022203
OpenAlexW4295879527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC0
measurements read32
identifiers read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.