Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962778›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Factors associated with the uptake of Intermittent Preventive Treatment (IPTp-SP) for malaria in pregnancy: Further analysis of the 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey.

Godwin Okeke Kalu, Joel Msafiri Francis, Latifat Ibisomi, Tobias Chirwa, Juliana Kagura

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Godwin Okeke KaluSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3395-1625
Joel Msafiri FrancisDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary care, School of Clinical Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1902-2683
Latifat IbisomiSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
Tobias ChirwaSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
Juliana KaguraSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
University of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnancy-associated malaria is preventable and curable with intermittent preventive treatment with Sulfodoxine-Pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP). However, despite the effectiveness of IPTp-SP against malaria in pregnancy, the uptake among pregnant women in Nigeria remains very low. Thus, this study aimed to establish the factors associated with the uptake of at least one dose and optimal doses of IPTp-SP among pregnant women aged 15 to 49 years living in Nigeria in 2018. The study included 12,742 women aged 15 to 49 years with live births two years before or during the 2018 Nigeria Demographic Health Survey (NDHS) in the analysis. Descriptive analysis was carried out to determine the prevalence of IPTp-SP uptake. Multivariable logistic regression was used to establish the factors associated with receiving IPTp-SP during pregnancy, adjusting for possible confounding factors. Given the complex survey design, all analyses are adjusted for sampling weight, stratification, and clustering. The p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. In 2018, the prevalence of at least one dose of IPTp-SP was 63.6% (95% CI:62.0-65.1), and optimal doses of IPTp-SP were 16.8% (95% CI:15.8-17.8) during pregnancy. After the multivariable analysis, age group, region, frequency of ANC visits, belief in IPTp-SP effectiveness, and morbidity caused by malaria predicted the uptake of at least one IPTp-SP dose. Similar maternal characteristics, including household wealth index, spouse's educational level, and media exposure were significantly associated with taking optimal IPTp-SP doses. For instance, women in the wealthiest households whose husbands had secondary education predicted a four-fold increase in uptake of at least one IPTp-SP dose (aOR:4.17; 95% CI:1.11-8.85). The low prevalence and regional variations of IPTp-SP uptake in the study area imply that most pregnant women in Nigeria are at substantial risk of pregnancy-associated malaria. Therefore, stakeholders should explore context-specific strategies to improve the IPTp-SP coverage across the regions in Nigeria.

Identifiers

PMID36962778
PMCPMC10021516
OpenAlexW4318766211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read152
identifiers read9
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.