Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962762›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Health facility assessments of cervical cancer prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment services in Gulu, Uganda.

Tana Chongsuwat, Aaliyah O Ibrahim, Ann E Evensen, James H Conway, Margaret Zwick, William Oloya

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tana ChongsuwatDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1129-0942
Aaliyah O IbrahimGulu Women's Economic Development & Globalization (GWED-G), Gulu, Uganda.
Ann E EvensenDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2158-5936
James H ConwayDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Margaret ZwickDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
William OloyaGulu Women's Economic Development & Globalization (GWED-G), Gulu, Uganda.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USGulu Women with Disabilities Union · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer is ranked globally in the top three cancers for women younger than 45 years, with the average age of death at 59 years of age. The highest burden of disease is in low-to-middle income countries (LMICs), responsible for 90% of the 311,000 cervical cancer deaths in 2018. This growing health disparity is due to the lack of quality screening and treatment programs, low human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates, and high human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection rates. To address these gaps in care, we need to develop a clear understanding of the resources and capabilities of LMICs' health care facilities to provide prevention, early diagnosis through screening, and treatment for cervical cancer.

objectivesThis project aimed to assess baseline available cervical cancer prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment resources, at facilities designated as Health Center III or above, in Gulu, Uganda.

methodsWe adapted the World Health Organization's Harmonized Health Facility Assessment for our own HFA and grading scale, deploying it in October 2021 for a cross-sectional analysis of 21 health facilities in Gulu.

resultsGrading of Health Center IIIs (n = 16) concluded that 37% had "excellent" or "good" resources available, and 63% of facilities had "poor" or "fair" resources available. Grading of Health Center IVs and above (n = 5) concluded that 60% of facilities had "excellent" or "good" resources, and 40% had "fair" resources available. DISCUSSION: The analysis of health facilities in Gulu demonstrated subpar resources available for cervical cancer prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment. Focused efforts are needed to expand health centers' resources and capability to address rising cervical cancer rates and related health disparities in LMICs. The development process for this project's HFA can be applied to global cervical cancer programming to determine gaps in resources and indicate areas to target improved health equity.

Identifiers

PMID36962762
PMCPMC10021907
OpenAlexW4320908764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read30
identifiers read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.