Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962760›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Real world external validation of metabolic gestational age assessment in Kenya.

Steven Hawken, Victoria Ward, A Brianne Bota, Monica Lamoureux, Robin Ducharme, Lindsay A Wilson, Nancy Otieno, Stephen Munga, Bryan O Nyawanda, Raphael Atito and 4 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Steven HawkenClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Victoria WardPrematurity Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2283-4052
A Brianne BotaClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Monica LamoureuxNewborn Screening Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Canada.
Robin DucharmeClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Lindsay A WilsonClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Nancy OtienoKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7083-4735
Stephen MungaKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Bryan O NyawandaKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0069-1473
Raphael AtitoKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
David K StevensonPrematurity Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Pranesh ChakrabortyNewborn Screening Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Canada.
Gary L DarmstadtPrematurity Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Kumanan WilsonClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1741-7705

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using data from Ontario Canada, we previously developed machine learning-based algorithms incorporating newborn screening metabolites to estimate gestational age (GA). The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of these algorithms in a population of infants born in Siaya county, Kenya. Cord and heel prick samples were collected from newborns in Kenya and metabolic analysis was carried out by Newborn Screening Ontario in Ottawa, Canada. Postnatal GA estimation models were developed with data from Ontario with multivariable linear regression using ELASTIC NET regularization. Model performance was evaluated by applying the models to the data collected from Kenya and comparing model-derived estimates of GA to reference estimates from early pregnancy ultrasound. Heel prick samples were collected from 1,039 newborns from Kenya. Of these, 8.9% were born preterm and 8.5% were small for GA. Cord blood samples were also collected from 1,012 newborns. In data from heel prick samples, our best-performing model estimated GA within 9.5 days overall of reference GA [mean absolute error (MAE) 1.35 (95% CI 1.27, 1.43)]. In preterm infants and those small for GA, MAE was 2.62 (2.28, 2.99) and 1.81 (1.57, 2.07) weeks, respectively. In data from cord blood, model accuracy slightly decreased overall (MAE 1.44 (95% CI 1.36, 1.53)). Accuracy was not impacted by maternal HIV status and improved when the dating ultrasound occurred between 9 and 13 weeks of gestation, in both heel prick and cord blood data (overall MAE 1.04 (95% CI 0.87, 1.22) and 1.08 (95% CI 0.90, 1.27), respectively). The accuracy of metabolic model based GA estimates in the Kenya cohort was lower compared to our previously published validation studies, however inconsistency in the timing of reference dating ultrasounds appears to have been a contributing factor to diminished model performance.

Identifiers

PMID36962760
PMCPMC10021775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read54
identifiers read8
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.