Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962757›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Understanding the contextual and cultural influences on women's modern contraceptive use in East Uganda: A qualitative study.

Amrita Namasivayam, Philip J Schluter, Sarah Namutamba, Sarah Lovell

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
19.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Amrita NamasivayamSchool of Health Sciences, University of Canterbury-Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0768-9042
Philip J SchluterSchool of Health Sciences, University of Canterbury-Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6799-6779
Sarah NamutambaInstitute of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Sarah LovellSchool of Health Sciences, University of Canterbury-Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha, Christchurch, New Zealand.
University of Canterbury · NZMakerere University · UGThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unmet need for contraception, defined as the percentage of women who are sexually active and want to avoid, space or limit pregnancies, but are not using a method of contraception, stands at 28.4% of all married women in Uganda. An understanding of women's contraceptive behaviours, and the motivations that drive these, are key to tackling unmet need, by way of designing, implementing and improving family planning programs to effectively meet the needs of different population groups. This qualitative study sought to understand women's contraceptive use and identify strategies to strengthen contraceptive uptake among women in the Busoga region of east Uganda (chosen due to its low contraceptive prevalence of 31.3% and high unmet need of 36.5% among married women of reproductive age). Six focus group discussions were conducted with single and married women across different age groups (18-24, 25-34, and ≥ 35 years), living in three urban and three rural districts. Thematic analyses of the data highlighted three major themes pertaining to the complex, multi-level nature of contributors to unmet need and women's use of contraception in the Busoga region. Within a largely patriarchal society, women had to navigate many obstacles. Some of these included: fears about contraceptive side effects; partner opposition, community beliefs and stigma that dissuaded contraceptive use; traditional gender and socio-cultural norms that dictated women's fertility choices; and service delivery limitations. Changing community narratives about family planning through testimonies from satisfied users, increasing male acceptance of contraception, and encouraging joint-decision making on matters of reproductive health are strategic focal areas for family planning initiatives to effectively tackle the problem of unmet need among women, and make contraceptives more accessible to women in Uganda.

Identifiers

PMID36962757
PMCPMC10022157
OpenAlexW4291617679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read13
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.