Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962704›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Implementation and evaluation of obstetric early warning systems in tertiary care hospitals in Nigeria.

Aminu Umar, Saidu Ibrahim, Idris Liman, Calvin Chama, Munirdeen Ijaiya, Matthews Mathai, Charles Ameh

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Improving surgical patients' safety in African hospitals: exploring healthcare professionals' experiences of Phase 1 of the '5Rs to Rescue' programme.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Aminu UmarDurham and Tees Valley GP Training Program, Health Education North-East of England, Newcastle, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9901-946X
Saidu IbrahimUniversity of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7950-4687
Idris LimanNational Hospital Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.
Calvin ChamaAbubakar Tafawa Balewa University Teaching Hospital, Bauchi, Nigeria.
Munirdeen IjaiyaUniversity of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1337-9588
Matthews MathaiCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Charles AmehCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2341-7605
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Ilorin Teaching Hospital · NGAbubakar Tafawa Balewa University · NGHealth Education England · GBNational Hospital Abuja · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obstetric Early Warning Systems (EWS) use combined clinical observations to predict increased risk of deterioration and alert health workers to institute actions likely to improve outcomes. The objective of this study was to explore the experience of health workers about the implementation of an obstetric EWS and assess its effectiveness as an alternative clinical monitoring method compared to standard practice. This mixed-method study included obstetric admissions (n = 2400) to inpatient wards between 01/08/2018 and 31/03/2019 at three Nigerian tertiary hospitals (1 intervention and two control). Outcomes assessed were the efficiency of monitoring and recording vital signs using the patient monitoring index and speed of post-EWS trigger specialist review. These were evaluated through a review of case notes before and four months after EWS was introduced. Qualitative data was collected to explore healthcare workers' views on EWS' acceptability and usability. EWS was correctly used in 51% (n = 307) of the women in the intervention site. Of these women, 58.6% (n = 180) were predicted to have an increased risk of deterioration, and 38.9% (n = 70) were reviewed within 1 hour. There was a significant improvement in the frequency of vital signs recording in the intervention site: observed/expected frequency improved to 0.91 from 0.57, p<0.005, but not in the control sites. Health workers reported that the EWS helped them cope with work demands while making it easier to detect and manage deteriorating patients. Nurses and doctors reported that the EWS was easy to use and that scores consistently correlated with the clinical picture of patients. Identified challenges included rotation of clinical staff, low staffing numbers and reduced availability of monitoring equipment. The implementation of EWS improved the frequency of patient monitoring, but a larger study will be required to explore the effect on health outcomes. The EWS is a feasible and acceptable tool in low-resource settings with implementation modifications. Trial registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN15568048. Registration date; 9/09/2020- Retrospectively registered, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15568048.

Identifiers

PMID36962704
PMCPMC10022187
OpenAlexW4286007884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read31
reference markers read4
identifiers read4
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.