Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962656›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

'You don't have to sleep with a man to get how to survive': Girl's perceptions of an intervention study aimed at improving sexual and reproductive health and schooling outcomes.

Linda Mason, Garazi Zulaika, Anna Maria van Eijk, Eunice Fwaya, David Obor, Penelope Phillips-Howard, Elizabeth Nyothach

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03051789 (Menstrual Cups and Cash Transfer to Reduce Sexual and Reproductive Harm and School Dropout in Adolescent Schoolgirls in Western Kenya), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03051789 nacompletednot on this map

Menstrual Cups and Cash Transfer to Reduce Sexual and Reproductive Harm and School Dropout in Adolescent Schoolgirls in Western Kenya: a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLiverpool School of Tropical MedicineRan2017 to 2021Enrolled4,138ConditionsReproductive Health, Herpesvirus Infection, HIV Infections, Woman AbuseArmsMenstrual Cup, Cash transfer, Cups and Cash
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Linda MasonLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1568-9261
Garazi ZulaikaLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Anna Maria van EijkLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1635-1289
Eunice FwayaMinistry of Health, Siaya County, Kenya.
David OborMinistry of Health, Siaya County, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2852-6368
Penelope Phillips-HowardLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth NyothachKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0904-9081
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBMinistry of Health · KEKenya Medical Research Institute · KE

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N006046/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In sub-Saharan Africa, girls suffer from high rates of morbidity and mortality, enduring high exposure to sexual and reproductive health harms. Staying in school helps protect girls from such harms. Focus group discussions were conducted in a rural, impoverished area of Kenya with adolescent girls participating in a 4-arm cluster randomised controlled trial, evaluating menstrual cups, cash transfer, or combined cups plus cash transfer against controls. To explore girls' perceptions of how trial interventions affected their SRH risks and schooling, semi-structured discussions were held at baseline, midline, and study end. Data was explored using thematic analysis. At baseline there were no discernible differences between the 4 intervention groups regarding their perceptions of relationships with boys/men, and difficulties attending or remaining in school. Midline and endline discussions found that narratives from those receiving cash transfer only, or alongside a cup were similar; girls noted fewer pregnancies and less school dropout, attributed to the cash transfer reducing the need for transactional sex. Lower absenteeism was reported by the cup only group, with perceived minimal effect on pregnancy and dropout. Girls in control and cup only groups described feeling valued through inclusion, benefitting from puberty and hygiene education. Although seemingly having little effect on reducing pregnancy or dropout, these inputs reportedly empowered girls, whilst cash transfer girls were emboldened to refuse male sexual advances. Girls noticed benefits from trial interventions, with a reduction in transactional sex and resulting pregnancy impacting on school dropout, or reduced menstrual related absenteeism. Education and study inclusion were perceived as important. Future programmes should consider alleviating material deprivation which prevents girls from attending or performing at school through schemes such as cash transfer, alongside hygiene and education packages. This will empower girls to refuse unwanted sex and understand risks, in addition to motivating academic achievement and school completion. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03051789.

Identifiers

PMID36962656
PMCPMC10021241
OpenAlexW4305057749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read6
identifiers read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.