Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962641›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Beyond checklists: Using clinic ethnography to assess the enabling environment for tuberculosis infection prevention control in South Africa.

Stella Arakelyan, Hayley MacGregor, Anna S Voce, Janet Seeley, Alison D Grant, Karina Kielmann

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Equitable mosaic: the ideal for medical pluralism.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Stella ArakelyanInstitute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, Queen Margaret University Way, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0326-707X
Hayley MacGregorThe Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9392-9331
Anna S VoceDiscipline Public Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9082-4449
Janet SeeleyDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Alison D GrantTB Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Karina KielmannInstitute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, Queen Margaret University Way, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBQueen Margaret University · GBUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sub-optimal implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) measures for airborne infections is associated with a rise in healthcare-acquired infections. Research examining contributing factors has tended to focus on poor infrastructure or lack of health care worker compliance with recommended guidelines, with limited consideration of the working environments within which IPC measures are implemented. Our analysis of compromised tuberculosis (TB)-related IPC in South Africa used clinic ethnography to elucidate the enabling environment for TB-IPC strategies. Using an ethnographic approach, we conducted observations, semi-structured interviews, and informal conversations with healthcare staff in six primary health clinics in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa between November 2018 and April 2019. Qualitative data and fieldnotes were analysed deductively following a framework that examined the intersections between health systems 'hardware' and 'software' issues affecting the implementation of TB-IPC. Clinic managers and front-line staff negotiate and adapt TB-IPC practices within infrastructural, resource and organisational constraints. Staff were ambivalent about the usefulness of managerial oversight measures including IPC protocols, IPC committees and IPC champions. Challenges in implementing administrative measures including triaging and screening were related to the inefficient organisation of patient flow and information, as well as inconsistent policy directives. Integration of environmental controls was hindered by limitations in the material infrastructure and behavioural norms. Personal protective measures, though available, were not consistently applied due to limited perceived risk and the lack of a collective ethos around health worker and patient safety. In one clinic, positive organisational culture enhanced staff morale and adherence to IPC measures. 'Hardware' and 'software' constraints interact to impact negatively on the capacity of primary care staff to implement TB-IPC measures. Clinic ethnography allowed for multiple entry points to the 'problematic' of compromised TB-IPC, highlighting the importance of capturing dimensions of the 'enabling environment', currently not assessed in binary checklists.

Identifiers

PMID36962641
PMCPMC10022266
OpenAlexW4308654422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read2
reference markers read13
identifiers read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.