Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962632›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Pregnant women's knowledge of obstetrical danger signs: A cross-sectional survey in Kigali, Rwanda.

Emmanuel Uwiringiyimana, Emery Manirambona, Samuel Byiringiro, Albert Nsanzimana, Neophyte Uhawenayo, Pacifique Ufitinema, Janviere Bayizere, Patricia J Moreland, Pamela Meharry, Diomede Ntasumbumuyange

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Emmanuel UwiringiyimanaCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Emery ManirambonaCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0579-3607
Samuel ByiringiroSchool of Nursing, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9165-0348
Albert NsanzimanaCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8567-3030
Neophyte UhawenayoCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Pacifique UfitinemaCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Janviere BayizereCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3817-2268
Patricia J MorelandNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Pamela MeharryHuman Resource for Health, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Diomede NtasumbumuyangeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rwanda and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7497-7856
University of Rwanda · RWEmory University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal mortality remains critically high in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. Rwanda's leading causes of maternal death include postpartum hemorrhage and obstructed labor. Maternal recognition of obstetrical danger signs is critical for timely access to emergency care to reduce maternal mortality.To assess maternal knowledge of obstetrical danger signs among pregnant women attending antenatal care services in Kigali, Rwanda. We conducted a cross-sectional study between September and December 2018. The outcome of interest was maternal knowledge of ODS during pregnancy, labor and delivery, and the immediate postpartum period. We recruited pregnant women at five health centers, one district hospital, and one referral hospital, and we had them complete a structured questionnaire. Reporting three correct ODS was defined as having good knowledge of ODS. A total of 382 pregnant women responded to the survey. Most women (48.9%) were aged 26-35, and 50.5% had completed secondary or higher education. The knowledge of ODS was 56%, 9%, and 17% during pregnancy, labor and delivery, and postpartum, respectively. Women aged 26 to 35 had two times (OR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.05, 3.06) higher odds of ODS knowledge during pregnancy than women aged 16 to 25. Attending three antenatal care visits was associated with 2.6 times (OR: 2.59, 95% CI: 1.17, 5.66) higher odds of ODS knowledge during pregnancy than not attending any visit. Longer distances to the nearby health facility were associated with significantly lower knowledge during pregnancy, and Muslim women had substantially higher postpartum ODS knowledge than any other religion. In conclusion, women's knowledge of ODS associated with labor and delivery and postpartum was low. Antenatal care must be encouraged and its content revised to ensure it covers potential late pregnancy complications.

Identifiers

PMID36962632
PMCPMC10021381
OpenAlexW4308942509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read56
identifiers read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.