Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962618›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Cervical cancer screening in a population of black South African women with high HIV prevalence: A cross-sectional study.

Joyce Sikwese Musonda, Pumla Pamella Sodo, Olalekan Ayo-Yusuf, Elizabeth Reji, John Musonda, Langalibalele Honey Mabuza, John Velaphi Ndimande, Jimmy Akii, Olufemi Babatunde Omole

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joyce Sikwese MusondaDepartment of Family Medicine & Primary Care, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Pumla Pamella SodoDivision of Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2542-6038
Olalekan Ayo-YusufSchool of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Elizabeth RejiDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
John MusondaDivision of Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Langalibalele Honey MabuzaDepartment of Family Medicine & Primary Health Care, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.
John Velaphi NdimandeDepartment of Family Medicine & Primary Health Care, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.
Jimmy AkiiDivision of Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Olufemi Babatunde OmoleDivision of Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
University of the Witwatersrand · ZASefako Makgatho Health Sciences University · ZAUniversity of Pretoria · ZAUniversity of the Free State · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is largely preventable through early detection, but screening uptake remains low among black women in South Africa. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and factors associated with cervical cancer screening in the past 10 years among black African women in primary health care (PHC) clinics, in Gauteng Province, South Africa. This was a cross-sectional study involving 672 consecutively recruited black women at cervical cancer screening programs in PHC clinics between 2017 and 2020. An interviewer-administered questionnaire covered socio-demographics, HIV status, sexual history, cervical cancer risk factors knowledge, and screening behaviours in the past 10 years. The mean age of participants was 38 years. More than half (63%) were aged 30-49 years. Most completed high school education (75%), were unemployed (61%), single (60%), and HIV positive (48%). Only 285 (42.4%) of participants reported screening for cervical cancer in the past 10 years. Of participants that reported receiving information on screening, 27.6% (n = 176) and 13.97% (n = 89) did so from healthcare facilities and community platforms respectively. Participants aged 30 years or more were more likely to report for cervical cancer screening as compared to other categories in the past 10 years. The study found low cervical cancer screening prevalence. This calls for health education campaigns and prevention strategies that would target individual patients' contexts and stages of behavioral change. Such strategies must also consider socio-demographic and clinical correlates of cervical cancer screening and promote better integration into PHC services in South Africa.

Identifiers

PMID36962618
PMCPMC10021232
OpenAlexW4309112588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read33
identifiers read7
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.