Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962616›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

A scoping review of the impact of organisational factors on providers and related interventions in LMICs: Implications for respectful maternity care.

Bhavya Reddy, Sophia Thomas, Baneen Karachiwala, Ravi Sadhu, Aditi Iyer, Gita Sen, Hedieh Mehrtash, Özge Tunçalp

Full text readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Exploring the causes of work-related stress and burnout among doctors in Bangladesh: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  3. Midwives' lived experiences of obstetric violence: a hermeneutic phenomenological study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Disrespectful Maternity Care and Postpartum Depression at 2 Months: A Population-Based Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Digital Dialogs on Rhesus Incompatibility: A Thematic Analysis of Web-Based Parental Narratives.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bhavya ReddyRamalingaswami Centre on Equity and Social Determinants of Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1281-2810
Sophia ThomasRamalingaswami Centre on Equity and Social Determinants of Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bangalore, India.
Baneen KarachiwalaRamalingaswami Centre on Equity and Social Determinants of Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2994-4297
Ravi SadhuT.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1147-2789
Aditi IyerRamalingaswami Centre on Equity and Social Determinants of Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bangalore, India.
Gita SenRamalingaswami Centre on Equity and Social Determinants of Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9010-074X
Hedieh MehrtashDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4991-616X
Özge TunçalpDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5370-682X

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have limited understanding of the organisational issues at the health facility-level that impact providers and care as it relates to mistreatment in childbirth, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). By extension, it is not clear what types of facility-level organisational changes or changes in working environments in LMICs could support and enable respectful maternity care (RMC). While there has been relatively more attention to health system pressures related to shortages of staff and other resources as key barriers, other organisational challenges may be less explored in the context of RMC. This scoping review aims to consolidate evidence to address these gaps. We searched literature published in English between 2000-2021 within Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar and ScienceDirect databases. Study selection was two-fold. Maternal health articles articulating an organisational issue at the facility- level and impact on providers and/or care in an LMIC setting were included. We also searched for literature on interventions but due to the limited number of related intervention studies in maternity care specifically, we expanded intervention study criteria to include all medical disciplines. Organisational issues captured from the non-intervention, maternal health studies, and solutions offered by intervention studies across disciplines were organised thematically and to establish linkages between problems and solutions. Of 5677 hits, 54 articles were included: 41 non-intervention maternal healthcare studies and 13 intervention studies across all medical disciplines. Key organisational challenges relate to high workload, unbalanced division of work, lack of professional autonomy, low pay, inadequate training, poor feedback and supervision, and workplace violence, and these were differentially influenced by resource shortages. Interventions that respond to these challenges focus on leadership, supportive supervision, peer support, mitigating workplace violence, and planning for shortages. While many of these issues were worsened by resource shortages, medical and professional hierarchies also strongly underpinned a number of organisational problems. Frontline providers, particularly midwives and nurses, suffer disproportionately and need greater attention. Transforming institutional leadership and approaches to supervision may be particularly useful to tackle existing power hierarchies that could in turn support a culture of respectful care.

Identifiers

PMID36962616
PMCPMC10021694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read4
identifiers read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.