Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962606›Full record

ReviewPLOS global public health2022

Prioritizing gender equity and intersectionality in Canadian global health institutions and partnerships.

Bianca Carducci, Emily C Keats, Michelle Amri, Katrina M Plamondon, Jeannie Shoveller, Onome Ako, F Gigi Osler, Carol Henry, Nitika Pant Pai, Erica Di Ruggiero

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bianca CarducciDepartment of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3815-3048
Emily C KeatsCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research, and Learning, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michelle AmriTakemi Program in International Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6692-3340
Katrina M PlamondonFaculty of Health and Social Development, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Jeannie ShovellerFaculty of Medicine, Community Health and Epidemiology Department, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Onome AkoAction Against Hunger, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
F Gigi OslerDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Carol HenryDivision of Nutrition, College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Nitika Pant PaiDepartment of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4672-0500
Erica Di RuggieroSocial and Behavioural Health Sciences Division, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite governmental efforts to close the gender gap and global calls including Sustainable Development Goal 5 to promote gender equality, the sobering reality is that gender inequities continue to persist in Canadian global health institutions. Moreover, from health to the economy, security to social protection, COVID-19 has exposed and heightened pre-existing inequities, with women, especially marginalized women, being disproportionately impacted. Women, particularly women who face bias along multiple identity dimensions, continue to be at risk of being excluded or delegitimized as participants in the global health workforce and continue to face barriers in career advancement to leadership, management and governance positions in Canada. These inequities have downstream effects on the policies and programmes, including global health efforts intended to support equitable partnerships with colleagues in low- and middle- income countries. We review current institutional gender inequities in Canadian global health research, policy and practice and by extension, our global partnerships. Informed by this review, we offer four priority actions for institutional leaders and managers to gender-transform Canadian global health institutions to accompany both the immediate response and longer-term recovery efforts of COVID-19. In particular, we call for the need for tracking indicators of gender parity within and across our institutions and in global health research (e.g., representation and participation, pay, promotions, training opportunities, unpaid care work), accountability and progressive action.

Identifiers

PMID36962606
PMCPMC10021364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read1
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.