ArticlePLOS global public health2022
Midwifery continuity of care: A scoping review of where, how, by whom and for whom?
Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Midwife continuity of care models versus other models of care for childbearing women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of midwifery students' continuity of care program on women's experiences of maternity care: A randomised controlled trial.PloS one · 2026Trial
- Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of Enhanced Midwifery Care to Support Women Experiencing Subclinical Depression: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Trial
- Midwifery Care Studies: A Reflexive Methodology for a Practice-Based Science.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2026Article
- A continuity of midwifery care research mission, vision and agenda.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- The organization of virtual care centers: A qualitative study in Dutch hospitals.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Determinants of Midwifery Workforce Disaster Preparedness and Its Impact on the Continuity of Maternal Care: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Impact of Community-Based Midwife Continuity of Care Models for Women Living in Areas of Social Disadvantage and Ethnic Diversity in the United Kingdom: A Prospective Cohort Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Article
- Women's Experience of Continuity During Antenatal Care: A Cross-Sectional Study in The Netherlands.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2026Article
- Midwives' Contribution to the Development of the Mothers' Bond with Their Newborn.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Experiences of woman- centered care among Iranian midwives and women: a qualitative study.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Maternity Care Experiences of African-Born Women Living in Melbourne, Australia: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Midwives practices and mothers' experiences during intrapartum midwifery care: a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Midwife-led care versus obstetrician-led care for childbearing women in early labor: A systematic review.European journal of midwifery · 2026Review
- Perinatal mental health and reproductive behavior among women in wartime Ukraine: a cohort study protocol.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Building paths to healthcare: an explorative qualitative study among undocumented mothers experiencing maternal and infant healthcare access in Switzerland.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Trauma-sensitive obstetrics: Potential for optimization from the providers' perspectives.European journal of midwifery · 2026Article
- Can we implement midwifery-led continuity of care in Ethiopia? Maternal health leaders and midwives perspective: a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Exploring Women's Perceived Quality of Antenatal Care: A Cross-Sectional Study in The Netherlands.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- The effectiveness of an integrated continuous team midwifery care model on the quality of antenatal care in Iran's health system: A randomized controlled trial.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Systems of care that provide midwifery care and services through a continuity of care model have positive health outcomes for women and newborns. We conducted a scoping review to understand the global implementation of these models, asking the questions: where, how, by whom and for whom are midwifery continuity of care models implemented? Using a scoping review framework, we searched electronic and grey literature databases for reports in any language between January 2012 and January 2022, which described current and recent trials, implementation or scaling-up of midwifery continuity of care studies or initiatives in high-, middle- and low-income countries. After screening, 175 reports were included, the majority (157, 90%) from high-income countries (HICs) and fewer (18, 10%) from low- to middle-income countries (LMICs). There were 163 unique studies including eight (4.9%) randomised or quasi-randomised trials, 58 (38.5%) qualitative, 53 (32.7%) quantitative (cohort, cross sectional, descriptive, observational), 31 (19.0%) survey studies, and three (1.9%) health economics analyses. There were 10 practice-based accounts that did not include research. Midwives led almost all continuity of care models. In HICs, the most dominant model was where small groups of midwives provided care for designated women, across the antenatal, childbirth and postnatal care continuum. This was mostly known as caseload midwifery or midwifery group practice. There was more diversity of models in low- to middle-income countries. Of the 175 initiatives described, 31 (18%) were implemented for women, newborns and families from priority or vulnerable communities. With the exception of New Zealand, no countries have managed to scale-up continuity of midwifery care at a national level. Further implementation studies are needed to support countries planning to transition to midwifery continuity of care models in all countries to determine optimal model types and strategies to achieve sustainable scale-up at a national level.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.