ArticlePLOS global public health2022
Knowledge and experience of physicians during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A global cross-sectional study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Mapping Mpox vaccine hesitancy using an integrated machine learning and structural equation modeling approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Healthcare Workers' Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Personal Protective Equipment in Reducing the Risk of COVID-19 Infection from 2020 to 2022.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Assessment of the knowledge, attitude, and future practices toward the concept of premarital screening among unmarried Lebanese adults: A cross-sectional study.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Public community knowledge regarding multidisciplinary rehabilitation of spinal cord injury in Lebanon: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Knowledge, willingness to provide service and preparedness for monkeypox infection among medical practitioners working in Bangladesh: a multicentred cross-sectional study.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- The model of solving ethical challenges with nursing based on faith in God: a new model for nurses to care during epidemics.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Assessing Healthcare Providers' Preparedness for Managing COVID-19 Patients: A Mixed-methods Study.Oman medical journal · 2024Article
- Knowledge sharing among academics from Egyptian medical schools during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Responses of health professionals to coronavirus, coronavirus variants, and vaccines: Cross-sectional study.Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Article
- COVID-19 Mortality Disparities Among Socially Vulnerable Medicare Beneficiaries Associated With the Quality of Nurse Work Environments in U.S. Hospitals.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physicians are on the frontline of the COVID-19 pandemic with responsibility to manage the disease. The aim of this study is to investigate physicians' knowledge, attitudes, perceptions and experiences, as well as preventative practices regarding the COVID-19 pandemic and COVID-19 vaccinations. Further, we explore physicians' recommendations for future pandemics. A mixed-methods online survey was disseminated to physicians globally. The survey was distributed via social media from August 9-30, 2021. Data collected included sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards COVID-19, concerns regarding vaccinations, and perspectives on policies implemented. Descriptive statistics were reported, and qualitative data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. A total of 399 physicians from 62 countries completed the survey, with similar participation from High Income Countries and Low- or Middle-Income Countries. Most physicians (87%) revealed a good level of knowledge while only half (54%) reported adhering to adequate preventative measures. More than half of participants (56%) indicated that the policies implemented to handle COVID-19 by their public health agencies were insufficient or disorganised. While most physicians reported increased mental stress (61%) and described their experience with COVID-19 using negative terminology (63%), most physicians (87%) indicated they are willing to continue working in healthcare. Physicians globally possessed good knowledge of COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccinations; yet improvements in ensuring compliance with preventative measures is warranted. Findings from this study have important implications. As recommended by physicians, efforts to manage pandemics should involve (1) strengthening health systems, (2) minimising adverse effects of infodemics, (3) delegating decision-making roles appropriately, and (4) acknowledging global responsibility.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.