ArticlePLOS global public health2022
Using health information for community activism: A case study of the movement for change and social justice in South Africa.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Community-Based Health Information Systems in Africa: A Scoping Review of Data Generation, Utilization, and Community Empowerment.Wellcome open research · 2024Pooled it
- Attitudes, Beliefs, and Predictors of Gestational Weight Gain and Postpartum Weight Retention in South Africa: A Mixed Methods Analysis.AIDS and behavior · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The access to, use, and exchange of health information is crucial when strengthening public health services and improving access to care. However, many health system stakeholders, including community groups are perpetually excluded from accessing and using health information. This is problematic as community groups, themselves end-users of care, are well-positioned to keep the health system accountable, provide feedback on the quality of services, and identify emerging health concerns. Using qualitative, ethnographic methods, this paper investigates different strategies used by the Movement for Change and Social Justice (MCSJ)-a local health activism group-to collect, use and distribute health information to improve health care in Gugulethu, a low-income neighbourhood in Cape Town, South Africa. Through participant observation, shadowing, informal conversations and semi-structured interviews that were analysed using iterative thematic analysis, findings revealed that MCSJ effectively collected, used and exchanged health information to develop short-term health campaigns. To get access to the needed health information, they used innovative strategies, including cultivating allies in the health system, finding safe spaces, and using community brokers to effectively mobilise community members to keep the health system accountable. MCSJ's strategies highlight that stakeholders' engagement with health information is not only a technical exercise, but a complex social process that requires constant negotiation and relationship building. Therefore, to make meaningful improvements to health services and create adaptive and responsive health systems, we need to include community groups as active stakeholders in the health system, provide relevant, up-to-date and locally relevant health information, and facilitate opportunities to socially engage with health information and those who produce it.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.