Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962507›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Are midwives ready to provide quality evidence-based care after pre-service training? Curricula assessment in four countries-Benin, Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda.

Ann-Beth Moller, Joanne Welsh, Elizabeth Ayebare, Effie Chipeta, Mechthild M Gross, Gisele Houngbo, Hashim Hounkpatin, Bianca Kandeya, Beatrice Mwilike, Gorrette Nalwadda and 3 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ann-Beth MollerSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3581-0938
Joanne WelshMidwifery Research and Education Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Elizabeth AyebareDepartment of Nursing, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Effie ChipetaKamuzu University of Health Sciences, Centre for Reproductive Health, Blantyre, Malawi.
Mechthild M GrossMidwifery Research and Education Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Gisele HoungboCentre de Recherche en Reproduction Humaine et en Démographie (CERRHUD), Cotonou, Benin.
Hashim HounkpatinCentre de Recherche en Reproduction Humaine et en Démographie (CERRHUD), Cotonou, Benin.
Bianca KandeyaKamuzu University of Health Sciences, Centre for Reproductive Health, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8829-4618
Beatrice MwilikeSchool of Nursing, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
Gorrette NalwaddaDepartment of Nursing, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Max PetzoldSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Antoinette SognonviCentre de Recherche en Reproduction Humaine et en Démographie (CERRHUD), Cotonou, Benin.
Claudia HansonGlobal Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research sought to map midwifery pre-service training curricula as part of the Action Leveraging Evidence to Reduce perinatal morTality and morbidity in sub-Saharan Africa (ALERT) project conducted in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda. We conducted the review in two phases. In the first phase, online interviews were performed with the lead project midwives in all four study countries to get an overview of midwifery care providers' pre-service training courses, registration, and licensing requirements. We performed a mapping review of midwifery care providers' pre-service training curricula from different training institutions in the four study countries during the second phase. Curricula were reviewed and mapped against the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) Essential Competencies framework to assess whether these curricula included the minimum essential training components described in the ICM framework. We identified 10 different professional titles for midwifery care providers. The number of years spent in pre-service training varied from one and a half to four years. Ten pre-service curricula were obtained and the assessment revealed that none of the curricula included all ICM competencies. Main gaps identified in all curricula related to women-centred care, inclusion of women in decision making, provision of care to women with unintended or mistimed pregnancy, fundamental human rights of individuals and evidence-based learning. This review suggests that there are skills, knowledge and behaviour gaps in pre-service training curricula for midwifery care providers when mapped to the ICM Essential Competencies framework. These gaps are similar among the different training courses in participating countries. The review also draws attention to the plethora of professional titles and different pre-service training curricula within countries. Trial registration: PACTR202006793783148-June 17th, 2020.

Identifiers

PMID36962507
PMCPMC10021168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read19
reference markers read9
identifiers read4
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.