Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962500›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

A qualitative investigation of facilitators and barriers to DREAMS uptake among adolescents with grandparent caregivers in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Dumile Gumede, Anna Meyer-Weitz, Thembelihle Zuma, Maryam Shahmanesh, Janet Seeley

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dumile GumedeCentre for General Education, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8628-5726
Anna Meyer-WeitzSchool of Applied Human Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Thembelihle ZumaAfrica Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Maryam ShahmaneshAfrica Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7129-8535
Janet SeeleyAfrica Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Africa Health Research Institute · ZADurban University of Technology · ZALondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZA

Funding

Maximizing combination HIV prevention, uptake and retention by adolescent girls and young womenR01MH114560 · NIMH · KWAZULU-NATAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE TB-HIV · PI SHAHMANESH, MARYAM · 2017 to 2023
$2.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114560Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescents with grandparent caregivers have experienced challenges including the death of one or both parents due to HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. They may be left out of existing HIV prevention interventions targeting parents and children. We investigated the facilitators and barriers to DREAMS (Determined, Resilient, Empowered, AIDS-free, Mentored and Safe) programme uptake among adolescents with grandparent caregivers across different levels of the socio-ecological model in rural South Africa. Data were collected in three phases (October 2017 to September 2018). Adolescents (13-19 years old) and their grandparent caregivers (≥50 years old) (n = 12) contributed to repeat in-depth interviews to share their perceptions and experiences regarding adolescents' participation in DREAMS. Data were triangulated using key informant interviews with DREAMS intervention facilitators (n = 2) to give insights into their experiences of delivering DREAMS interventions. Written informed consent or child assent was obtained from all individuals before participation. All data were collected in isiZulu and audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and translated into English. Thematic and dyadic analysis approaches were conducted guided by the socio-ecological model. Participation in DREAMS was most effective when DREAMS messaging reinforced existing norms around sex and sexuality and when the interventions improved care relationships between the adolescents and their older caregivers. DREAMS was less acceptable when it deviated from the norms, raised SRH information that conflicts with abstinence and virginity, and when youth empowerment was perceived as a potential threat to intergenerational power dynamics. While DREAMS was able to engage these complex families, there were failures, about factors uniquely critical to these families, such as in engaging children and carers with disabilities and failure to include adolescent boys in some interventions. There is a need to adapt HIV prevention interventions to tackle care relationships specific to adolescent-grandparent caregiver communication.

Identifiers

PMID36962500
PMCPMC10022343
OpenAlexW4296741138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read12
identifiers read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.