ArticlePLOS global public health2022
Population benefits of addressing programmatic and social determinants of gender disparities in tuberculosis in Viet Nam: A modelling study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modelling the impact of increasing tuberculosis treatment coverage and addressing determinants of risk in men.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Trend and forecast analysis of the changing disease burden of tuberculosis in China, 1990-2021.Epidemiology and infection · 2025Article
- Preventing tuberculosis with community-based care in an HIV-endemic setting: a modelling analysis.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2024Article
- Preventing tuberculosis with community-based care in an HIV-endemic setting: a modeling analysis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
High prevalence of infectious tuberculosis among men suggests potential population-wide benefits from addressing programmatic and social determinants of gender disparities. Utilising a sex-stratified compartmental transmission model calibrated to tuberculosis burden estimates for Viet Nam, we modelled interventions to increase active case finding, to reduce tobacco smoking, and to reduce alcohol consumption by 2025 in line with national and global targets. For each intervention, we examined scenarios differentially targeting men and women and evaluated impact on tuberculosis morbidity and mortality in men, women, and children in 2035. Active case finding interventions targeting men projected greater reductions in tuberculosis incidence in men, women, and children (16.2%, uncertainty interval, UI, 11.4-23.0%, 11.8%, UI 8.0-18.6%, and 21.5%, UI 16.9-28.5%, respectively) than those targeting women (5.2%, UI 3.8-7.1%, 5.4%, UI 3.9-7.3%, and 8.6%, UI 6.9-10.7%, respectively). Projected reductions in tuberculosis incidence for interventions to reduce male tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption were greatest for men (17.4%, UI 11.8-24.7%, and 11.0%, UI 5.4-19.4%, respectively), but still substantial for women (6.9%, UI 3.8-12.5%, and 4.4%, UI 1.9-10.6%, respectively) and children (12.7%, UI 8.4-19.0%, and 8.0%, UI 3.9-15.0%, respectively). Comparable interventions targeting women projected limited impact, with declines of 0.3% (UI 0.2%-0.3%) and 0.1% (UI 0.0%-0.1%), respectively. Addressing programmatic and social determinants of men's tuberculosis burden has population-wide benefits. Future interventions to increase active case finding, to reduce tobacco smoking, and to reduce harmful alcohol consumption, whilst not ignoring women, should focus on men to most effectively reduce tuberculosis morbidity and mortality in men, women, and children.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.