Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962454›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Community-based house improvement for malaria control in southern Malawi: Stakeholder perceptions, experiences, and acceptability.

Tinashe A Tizifa, Steven Gowelo, Alinune N Kabaghe, Robert S McCann, Tumaini Malenga, Richard M Nkhata, Asante Kadama, Yankho Chapeta, Willem Takken, Kamija S Phiri and 3 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tinashe A TizifaDivision of Internal Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases, Center for Tropical Medicine and Travel Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5040-2807
Steven GoweloSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9501-578X
Alinune N KabagheSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8517-1586
Robert S McCannSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2195-6461
Tumaini MalengaSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7269-0405
Richard M NkhataSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Asante KadamaSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5087-6321
Yankho ChapetaSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Willem TakkenLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1976-0726
Kamija S PhiriSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1753-2727
Michele van VugtDivision of Internal Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases, Center for Tropical Medicine and Travel Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8365-2482
Henk van den BergLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9983-638X
Lucinda Manda-TaylorSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8149-0897

Funding

FELLOWSHIP TRAINING PROGRAM IN VACCINOLOGYT32AI007524 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Marcelo B. Sztein · 1997 to 2026
$6.4M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

House improvement (HI) refers to the full screening or closing of openings such as windows, doors, and eaves, as well as the installation of ceilings, to reduce mosquito-human contact indoors. HI is a viable supplementary intervention that reduces malaria transmission further than the existing strategies alone. In Malawi, HI has not been widely implemented and evaluated for malaria control. Concerns about lack of local evidence, durability in different epidemiological and cultural settings, and the cost of large-scale implementation are among the reasons the strategy is not utilised in many low-income countries. This study assessed community perceptions, experiences, and acceptability of community-led HI in Chikwawa district, southern Malawi. This was a qualitative study where separate focus group discussions were conducted with members from the general community (n = 3); health animators (n = 3); and HI committee members (n = 3). In-depth interviews were conducted with community members (n = 20), and key-informant interviews were conducted with health surveillance assistants and chiefs (n = 23). All interviews were transcribed and coded before performing a thematic content analysis to identify the main themes. Coded data were analysed using Nvivo 12 Plus software. Study participants had a thorough understanding of HI. Participants expressed satisfaction with HI, and they reported enabling factors to HI acceptability, such as the reduction in malaria cases in their villages and the safety and effectiveness of HI use. Participants also reported barriers to effective HI implementation, such as the unavailability and inaccessibility of some HI materials, as well as excessive heat and darkness in HI houses compared to non-HI houses. Participants indicated that they were willing to sustain the intervention but expressed the need for strategies to address barriers to ensure the effectiveness of HI. Our results showed the high knowledge and acceptability of HI by participants in the study area. Intensive and continued health education and community engagement on the significance of HI could help overcome the barriers and improve the acceptability and sustainability of the intervention.

Identifiers

PMID36962454
PMCPMC10021647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read19
identifiers read3
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.